Skip Header

Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation

Each depositor insured to at least $250,000 per insured bank



Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations




FDIC Federal Register Citations


COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COALITION OF ARIZONA


September 3, 2004

Donald E. Powell
Chairman
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
550 17th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20429

John M. Reich
Vice Chairman
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
550 17th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20429

Thomas J. Curry
Director
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
550 17th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20429

John D. Hawke, Jr.
Comptroller of the Currency
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
250 E Street, SW
Washington, DC 20219

Gentlemen:

I am writing to express strong concern and opposition for the proposal being made to change the CRA exam threshold. Communities in Arizona are working hard to address the housing needs of their working families as well as lower-income households, and also undertake community revitalization in long-neglected areas. We have good state level public sector programs, and have been successful in also utilizing federal funds but the lending institutions are a key partner as well and an important part of the solution.

Despite our successes locally and across the country, the banks and thrift institutions that provide the loans and investments to build new homes, businesses, and community facilities may no longer have the impetus to do so if you change the CRA exam threshold.

It is estimated that 2,000 financial institutions would no longer be evaluated on their investment or services to low and moderate-income communities under the proposal you are considering to raise the investment threshold from the current level of $250 million to $l billion. These proposed rule changes would have a devastating effect on affordable housing investment in Arizona and elsewhere.

This proposal would eliminate the CRA exam threshold, from 45 of the 50 institutions in Arizona. This would dry up the business now occurring in low-income communities and put an inordinate demand on the remaining 5 financial institutions that would still have the CRA exam threshold obligation.

CRA work is not a burden, nor is it a money-loser for financial institutions, and CRA exam is not excessively onerous from what the financial institutions tell me in our local conversations. Please leave the threshold, as it is now, the asset level of $250 million works because it covered the majority of the market there by setting the "norm" for the rest. This is one of the most important issues affecting the relevance of financial institutions to the communities that they claim to serve, please don't weaken it.

Sincerely,
Donard C. Taylor
Executive Director

 

Last Updated 09/13/2004 regs@fdic.gov

Skip Footer back to content