Skip Header

Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation

Each depositor insured to at least $250,000 per insured bank



Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations




FDIC Federal Register Citations



Bank of Georgia

From: Kimberly F Higgins
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 9:11 AM
To: Comments
Subject: Community Reinvestment -- RIN 3064-AC50

The Bank of Georgia is a community bank that has grown to an asset size of $238 million in less than five years. Such growth would have been impossible without the support of and our investment in our community. As a bank approaching the $250 million mark, we strongly support the FDIC’s proposal to raise the “small bank” threshold to $1 billion.

After reading many of the comments regarding this proposal, it is apparent that many feel that this proposal is going to “do away with” or repeal the Community Reinvestment Act. We understand that this is not the case; the proposed increased threshold will alleviate some of the more burdensome reporting and record keeping requirements for small institutions, not undermine the CRA.

A $250 million bank of today is certainly not the same as a $250 million dollar bank of twenty years ago. Today, an institution of that size is truly a “small bank”. If we are classified as a large institution, it will require the purchase of expensive record keeping software and the hiring of additional staff to comply with the reporting requirements. Recent years have already added a significant compliance burden to the financial industry with the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the US PATRIOT Act. While we wholly support the spirit of these regulations, and that of the CRA, the regulatory burden of compliance has a much greater impact on a small institution than on a larger one.

We do oppose the addition of a mandatory community development performance criterion for banks with assets between $250 million and $1 billion. The proposal does not explain what this criterion would be, and we fear that this too could result in additional regulatory burden. We especially oppose any criterion that would establish an arbitrary ratio or number to be used in evaluating an institution’s community investment activities. We believe that these activities should be judged subjectively on the opportunities within the institution’s community and compared with the institution’s peers, rather than compared to a national average that takes into account areas with significantly different CRA opportunities.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposal.

Sincerely,

Pat Shepherd
President and CEO
The Bank of Georgia
Peachtree City, GA

 

Last Updated 09/13/2004 regs@fdic.gov

Skip Footer back to content