Skip Header

Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation

Each depositor insured to at least $250,000 per insured bank



Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations




FDIC Federal Register Citations

 



Oregon Housing & Community Services



From: Jack Kenny [mailto:jack.kenny@hcs.state.or.us]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 1:52 PM
To: Comments
Subject: Interagency Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Community Reinvestment Act

Jack Kenny
PO Box 14508
Salem, OR 97309


April 6, 2004

Federal Deposit Insurance Corp
Robert Feldman, Executive Secretary
550 17th Street NW
Washington, DC 20429


Dear Insurance Corp:

Docket No. 04-06
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

Docket No. R-1181
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Attention: Comments
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Regulation Comments
Office of Thrift Supervision


To Whom it May Concern:

Oregon Housing & Community Services (OHCS) appreciates the opportunity to
comment on the Joint Notice of Proposed Rulemaking regarding the Community
Reinvestment Act (CRA) [69 FR 5729].

While we commend your efforts regarding the expansion of data collection,
the proposal to change the definition of "small banks" will undermine the
intent of the law in providing equitable lending in underserved
communities. We cannot support this proposal and we urge you to withdraw
the proposed definition of small banks.

Change in the Definition of "Small Banks"

The agencies propose to make approximately 1,100 banks subject to less
rigorous CRA exams by changing the "small bank" limit from $250 million to
$500 million. The long history of partnership between banks and CDFIs
indicates that investment opportunities are available to banks of all
sizes and in all regions. The proposal would particularly impact rural
communities, where the number of institutions subject to complete CRA
exams would decline by an estimated 73%, according to the National
Community Capital Association.

We strongly urge you to withdraw this proposed change from consideration
to ensure continued inclusion of "investment" and "service" tests in the
CRA exams of a maximum number of banks.

Conclusion

The Community Reinvestment Act has channeled billions of dollars into
underserved markets and fostered new, productive partnerships between
banks and community organizations. The regulators must not roll back
these gains in providing access to capital. Improved and enhanced data
disclosure is an important step, but other aspects of the proposal
threaten the expansion of capital and credit in underserved communities.
We urge you to:

* Maintain an investment test as part of banks' CRA performance by
maintaining the current "small bank" definition. * Continue to hold banks
that are part of large holding companies to the "large institution"
standards. * Expand CRA so that it better reflects changes in the
financial services industry brought about by market shifts, technology
advances, and financial modernization legislation.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment.

Sincerely,


Jack Kenny
Deputy Director
Oregon Housing & Community Services


 

 

Last Updated 04/23/2004 regs@fdic.gov

Skip Footer back to content