Skip Header

Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation

Each depositor insured to at least $250,000 per insured bank



Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations




FDIC Federal Register Citations

Branch Banking & Trust Co.

March 31, 2004

Mr. Robert E. Feldman
Executive Secretary
Attention: Comments, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
550 17th Street NW
Washington, DC 20429

Re: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking regarding the Community Reinvestment Act.

Dear Mr. Feldman:

Branch Banking and Trust (BB&T) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the joint interagency notice of proposed rulemaking regarding the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) Regulation.
BB&T Corporation, headquartered in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, operates more than 1,350 banking offices in the Carolinas, Virginia, Maryland, West Virginia, Kentucky, Tennessee, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Indiana and Washington, D.C. Currently, BB&T Corp. is the nation's 13th largest financial holding company with over $90 billion in assets.

The following comments address the proposed revisions for (1) adjusting the definition of "small institution" and (2) considering violations of other laws when assigning the CRA rating.

1) Small Institution
Proposal to raise the small institution asset threshold to $500 million, without reference to holding company assets.

Although this revision will not directly impact BB&T, we agree that redefining "small institution" to include institutions with total assets up to $500 million will improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the regulatory process.

2) Credit Terms and Practices –

a. Proposal to clarify that an institution's CRA evaluation will be adversely affected by evidence of discriminatory, other illegal and abusive credit practice by any affiliate, if any loans of that affiliate have been considered in the CRA evaluation pursuant to 22©(1) and (2).

BB&T supports and maintains high standards when providing credit to customers and complying with all lending laws. However, we do not agree with adding other banking regulations to CRA. Specifically, the proposal to assess "...discriminatory, other illegal or abusive credit practices..." i.e. predatory lending as a part of the bank's CRA Examination. Although BB&T strongly rejects this type of lending, we believe the CRA regulation is not the appropriate means to address this issue. When you consider the numerous definitions of predatory lending along with the proposal to include affiliate lending, these additions may ultimately decrease the effectiveness of the regulation by increasing the complexity and cost of compliance.

BB&T appreciates your consideration on these proposed revisions to the CRA regulations. Should you have questions regarding our comments, please contact me at 704-954-1100.

Respectfully,

Chester A. Williams, Sr.
Branch Banking & Trust Co
200 South College St
Charlotte, NC 28202

Last Updated 04/27/2004 regs@fdic.gov

Skip Footer back to content