Dear
Sirs:
We applaud your efforts to reduce regulatory burden on the financial services
industry. Our comments are as follows:
- CRA and HMDA – We recommend that the threshold for CRA and HMDA reporting
be raised to $1 billion.
- Regulation B – Equal Credit Opportunity – Monitoring information – The
recent revisions make this requirement difficult for everyone. If the customer
elects not to disclose this information, the loan officer is required to complete
the information through a visual determination. This is not an easy task for
the loan officer, and at best is truly a guess on the loan officer’s part.
Since the customer elected not to provide the information, it seems that we are
collecting the information against the customer’s desires.
- Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) –. HUD-1. With respect
to HUD’s proposed changes—While we understand that HUD has withdrawn
the proposed changes to RESPA, if this comes to pass the burden on financial
institutions would be difficult. We all know that it is extremely difficult to
get a realistic picture from the customer within 3 days, let alone have that
become a contract for fees to be paid at closing. The Good Faith Estimate is
just that, an "Estimate" of the costs. Situations change all the time,
and to make the estimate a contract would be unrealistic. The Good Faith Estimate & Early
Truth In Lending disclosures are an estimate based on the facts that are known
at the time of application. A change of this type would cause additional undue
burden on lenders.
In closing, we
agree that there is a need to find a way to lessen the burden,
but in it’s place continue to increase consumer education
so that consumers are better able to make informed decisions about
products and services they purchase or participate in. We thank
you for the opportunity to submit comments on these topics.
Respectfully,
Denise M. Calabrese
Senior Compliance Officer
Community Bank of Northern Virginia