|
FDIC Federal Register Citations
Iowa Bankers Association
October 18, 2004
Public Information Room
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
250 E Street, SW., Mailstop 1-5
Washington, DC 20219
Attn: Docket # 0418
Jennifer J. Johnson, Secretary
Board of Governors, Federal Reserve
20th Street & Constitution Ave, NW
Washington, DC 20551
Docket No. R-1206
Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary
Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
550 17th Street, NW.
Washington, DC 20429
Regulation Comments
Chief Counsel’s Office
Office of Thrift Supervision
1700 G. Street, NW.
Washington, DC 20552
No. 2004-35
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Iowa Bankers Association
(IBA) is a trade association representing nearly 95% of 400+ banks
and savings
associations in the State of Iowa. We appreciate
this opportunity to comment on the request to reduce regulatory burden
in rules categorized as “Consumer Protection,” including
account/deposit relationships and miscellaneous consumer rules.
Every day, we hear from our members that the regulatory burdens placed
on them, disclosure requirements, record retention requirements, monitoring
requirements, etc., create undue hardships in allocation of resources,
both human and financial, which impede their ability to effectively deliver
products and services to existing customer bases, let alone the ability
to develop and deliver new products and services and effectively compete
in an ever-widening financial services industry.
While many of the
regulatory requirements have been set by agency rule or regulation,
over which
you exercise control, others are statutorily
set. This creates a more difficult environment in which to affect change – literally,
an act of Congress. We encourage your efforts to address these concerns
to Congress in hopes of effecting change.
Consumer Protection in Sales of Insurance
The credit disclosure required under part 40(b) is duplicative of the
credit insurance disclosure required under Reg. Z section 226.4(d),
and should be eliminated.
The requirement to provide the consumer disclosure both orally and in
written format is duplicative. We recommend that the consumer insurance
disclosure be provided in either format, with an appropriate acknowledgement
of receipt of the disclosure.
Privacy of Consumer Financial Information
Under existing law, financial institutions are required to deliver a
privacy notice annually to all consumer customers. This creates an
unnecessary expense for those institutions that have not made changes
to their privacy practices. We recommend a statutory change to eliminate
the requirement for an annual notice, requiring a subsequent notice
to be delivered only when an institution’s privacy practices
change.
Under part 12 of the Privacy regulation, the definition of “transaction
account” should be clarified or eliminated. This definition is
inconsistent with the definition of “transaction account” found
in Reg. D and Reg. CC, and is unclear as to what it is intended to cover.
We oppose any further regulatory amendments that would impose more burdensome
compliance requirements on institutions, such as expanded content requirements,
format requirements (e.g. minimum type size, prescribed headers, etc.),
or an opt-in provision instead of the existing opt-out.
Safeguarding Customer Information (GLBA 501(b))
Currently, the provisions establishing compliance expectations under
GLBA 501(b) have been set out as guidelines rather than regulations,
however, the examination practices treat these guidelines as if they
have the full force and effect of regulations. This creates an overly
burdensome compliance obligation, particularly on small institutions.
The expected risk analysis and documentation of each, minute detail
of banks’ administrative, technical and physical safeguards of
customer records and information overwhelm these institutions. In addition,
the vendor due diligence requirements, suggesting that banks periodically
conduct on-site inspections of vendors’ internal security procedures
and review in detail the vendors’ security programs, create a
concern among banks that they may be overreaching their responsibilities
as a party to contracts with those vendors – to the extent of
engaging in management practices of the vendor.
Examination practices must be adjusted to the size and sophistication
of each institution, reflective of each bank’s risk. What we hear
from members is that the approach to examination is “one-size fits
all” – that the same expectations are applied to small institutions
as for large.
Currently, the guidelines provide little, if any, assistance (particularly
for small institutions) as to how to manage compliance with the guidelines.
Additional commentary, best practices, frequently asked questions or
other guidance would be helpful.
Reg. E – Electronic
Funds Transfers Act
Perhaps the most misunderstood provisions of this act deal with error
resolution and determining consumer liability in the event of error.
Additional clarification, or additional examples, would be helpful.
Reg. DD – Truth
in Savings Act
The requirement of section 230.5 for delivering full-blown TISA disclosures
together with maturity notices on automatically renewable certificate
of deposit terms over one year is redundant and should be eliminated.
The TISA disclosures are provided to consumers at the time of initial
purchase of the certificate of deposit, and a renewal on the same terms
should require no further disclosure. In addition, Reg. DD establishes
a change in terms notification requirement, so that automatically renewing
certificates of deposits for which a change in terms will be made at
maturity should have already been notified under the disclosure requirements
of 230.5(a).
Regarding advertising requirements, Reg. DD at section 230.8(e) allows
for some exemptions from full advertising disclosures when certain media
are used. We recommend including “electronic billboards” (the
billboards that have digital display messages in running format, whether
located inside or outside an institution) in the category exempting “outdoor
media”; and “voice response units” in the category
exempting “telephone response machines.” We have heard complaints
that these media are not always consistently exempted during examinations.
FDIC Deposit Insurance Coverage
We appreciate FDIC’s simplification of the regulations for accounts
held in connection with living trusts, issued February 4, 2004. We encourage
ongoing review of the insurance coverage limits and potential expansion
of maximum coverage per ownership category.
Thank you for consideration of these comments. Feel free to contact
me at 515-286-4391 or via e-mail, dbauman@iowabankers.com, should you
have questions or need further information.
Sincerely,
Dodie Bauman, CRCM
Compliance Manager
|
