Skip Header

Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation

Each depositor insured to at least $250,000 per insured bank



Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations




FDIC Federal Register Citations

From: H. Clay Hawkins
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 8:44 AM
To: Comments
Subject: Customer Identification Program

Re: FIL-92-2002 - Customer Identification Programs

Comment from Claremont Savings Bank, $250,000,000 mutual savings Bank
located in town of 13,000 in NH.

The Bank commends the Regulatory Agencies on efforts to curtail money
laundering and other suspicious activity, especially as the agencies become
more inclusive in the coverage of these activities by all types of financial
entities. Once again, however, the regulators are trying to formulate rules
and regulations that fit all sizes and types of institutions without
providing the necessary flexibility in the Customer Identification Programs
(CIP).

While identification of customers is a risk-based activity and the program
"should be tailored to the bank's size, location, and type of business",
there are stipulations in the Federal Register that need to be addressed as
voluntary or recommended procedures and not as required procedures. There is
a difference between organizations such as a tennis club in Claremont, NH
and a mosque in Detroit, MI (or Irish fraternal group in Boston's North
End).

Although both organizations may have been in existence and have done
business with a financial institution for decades, they both have regular
changes in officers and authorized signors on accounts. One may have a
limited number of members with cash flows of under $10,000 annually while
the other may have thousands of members and over $1,000,000 in cash flows.
The tennis club may spend all its funds on local taxes, heat, and
electricity while the mosque may wire funds to constituents all over the
world. The tennis club members may be known locally by the financial
institution while the mosque members may be anonymous. Clearly these are
different risk profiles that cannot fit neatly into fixed policies and
procedures for identifying and verifying all authorized signors on the
accounts. Claremont, with its 2% minority, non-transient population, is not
the same as Detroit.

The other major concern regarding CIP is the copying of documents and
retention of identifying material for 5 years. The Driver's License, which
is a government issued picture ID, is the customary method of identifying NH
citizens. State law specifically "prohibits any person from scanning,
recording, retaining or storing, in any electronic form or format, personal
information obtained from any driver's license..." A policy of recording
the license number or passport number should be sufficient evidence of
identifying new customers. Law enforcement can always go to the source
document in the few cases where further action is required.

To quote the Federal Register, "the procedures must be based on the bank's
assessment of the risks..." If the bank sees no risk of money laundering in
an account, it should not have to document, verify, record keep, and OFAC
test the customers. To apply one set of universal standards to all banks
puts a disproportionate burden on small community banks that know their
customers via non-documentary means.

H. Clay Hawkins IV
President
Claremont Savings Bank
Claremont, NH

Last Updated 09/19/2002 regs@fdic.gov

Skip Footer back to content