Skip Header

Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation

Each depositor insured to at least $250,000 per insured bank



Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations




FDIC Federal Register Citations

February 11, 2003

Robert E. Feldman
Executive Secretary
Attention: Comments/ES
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
550 17th St. NW
Washington DC 20429

RE: Proposed Rule Part 303

Dear Mr. Feldman:

The National Community Reinvestment Coalition (NCRC) opposes the FDIC's proposal to waive regulatory procedures on a case-by-case basis that are not required by statute. NCRC is the nation's CRA trade association of 700 community-based organizations who use the merger application process to comment on community reinvestment and fair lending performance of lending institutions.

If the FDIC waived regulations not required by statute, we believe that it is likely that the agency will waive public comment, public notice requirements, and other vital parts of the merger application process. Consequently, the public's input into mergers that affect access to credit and capital for minority and low- and moderate communities will be cut-off. In other words, the public would have no recourse to a federal agency when a merger affects the wellbeing of their community. Public comments have motivated banks and federal agencies to address weaknesses in lender community reinvestment and fair lending performance. Therefore, eliminating public comment eliminates the chance to increase bank lending and investing after mergers.

In order for a regulatory process to be fair to all parties, the federal agency cannot waive a process for some banks and not others. Waivers on a case-by-case basis are arbitrary and result in uneven regulatory enforcement. NCRC urges the FDIC to withdraw, this proposal.

The Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) has granted itself the authority to waive non-statutory procedures on merger applications. NCRC members, including Inner City Press/Community on the Move, have experienced arbitrary decisions on OTS merger proceedings. For example, the AIG American General application was not subject to informal and formal meetings with community groups and the regulator while other mergers have been. It seems that the more contested mergers in which lenders have noted weaknesses in their reinvestment performance are precisely the ones qualifying for the streamlined procedures. The FDIC would be abdicating its fair lending and community reinvestment enforcement obligations if it adopted the same non-statutory waiver procedures as the OTS.

If you have any questions, please contact myself or Josh Silver, Vice President of Research and Policy, on 202-628-8866.

Sincerely,

John Taylor
President and CEO
National Community Reinvestment Coalition
733 15th Street, N.W. Suite 540
Washington, DC  20005-2129

Last Updated 03/10/2003 regs@fdic.gov

Skip Footer back to content