
|
Trust Examination Manual
Appendix E Employee Benefit Law
Employer
Securities and Real Property - General
Originally issued September 20, 1977 (42 FR 47201)
-
In General. Section 407(a)(1) of the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the Act) states that
except as otherwise provided in section 407 and section 414 of the
Act, a plan may not acquire or hold any employer security which is not a
qualifying employer security or any employer real property which is not
qualifying employer real property. Section 406(a)(1)(E)
prohibits a fiduciary from knowingly causing a plan to engage in a transaction
which constitutes a direct or indirect acquisition, on behalf of a plan, of any
employer security or employer real property in violation of
section 407(a), and section 406(a)(2) prohibits
a fiduciary who has authority or discretion to control or manage assets of a
plan to permit the plan to hold any employer security or employer real property
if he knows or should know that holding such security or real property violates
section 407(a).
-
Requirements applicable to all plans. A plan may hold or acquire only employer
securities which are qualifying employer securities and employer real property
which is qualifying employer real property. A plan may not hold employer
securities and employer real property which are not qualifying employer
securities and qualifying employer real property, except to the extent that:
-
The employer security is held by a plan which has made an election under
section 407(c)(3) of the Act; or
-
The employer security is a loan or other extension of credit which satisfies
the requirements of section 414(c)(1) of the Act or the employer real
property is leased to the employer pursuant to a lease which satisfies the
requirements of section 414(c)(2) of the Act.
Regulation published in Federal Register September 20, 1977
(42 FR 47201) and amended November 22, 1977 (42 FR 59842).
Codified to 29 C.F.R. 2550.407a-1.
Department of Labor
Regulation 2550.407a-2
29 C.F.R. 2550.407a-2.
Employer
Securities and Real Property - Acquisition
Originally issued September 20, 1977 (42 FR 47201)
-
In General. Section 407(a)(2) of the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the Act) provides that
a plan may not acquire any qualifying employer security or qualifying employer
real property, if immediately after such acquisition the aggregate fair market
value of qualifying employer securities and qualifying employer real property
held by the plan exceeds 10 percent of the fair market value of the assets
of the plan.
-
Acquisitions. For purposes of section 407(a)
of the Act, an acquisition by a plan of qualifying employer securities
or qualifying employer real property shall include, but not be limited to, an
acquisition by purchase, by the exchange of plan assets, by the exercise of
warrants or rights, by the conversion of a security (except any acquisition
pursuant to a conversion exempt under section 408(b)(7)
of the Act), by default of a loan where the qualifying employer
security or qualifying employer real property was security for the loan, or by
the contribution of such securities or real property to the plan. However, an
acquisition of a security shall not be deemed to have occurred if a plan
acquires the security as a result of a stock dividend or stock split.
-
Fair Market Value - Indebtedness incurred in connection with the acquisition of
a plan asset. In determining whether a plan is in compliance with the
limitation on the acquisition of qualifying employer securities and qualifying
employer real property in section 407(a)(2),
the limitation on the holding of qualifying employer securities and qualifying
employer real property in section 407(a)(3)
and the requirement regarding the disposition of employer securities and
employer real property in section 407(a)(4)
thereunder, the fair market value of total plan assets shall be the fair market
value of such assets less the unpaid amount of:
-
Any indebtedness incurred by the plan in acquiring such assets;
-
Any indebtedness incurred before the acquisition of such assets if such
indebtedness would not have been incurred but for such acquisition; and
-
Any indebtedness incurred after the acquisition of such assets if such
indebtedness would not have been incurred but for such acquisition and the
incurrence of such indebtedness was reasonably foreseeable at the time of such
acquisition. However, the fair market value of qualifying employer securities
and qualifying employer real property shall be the fair market value of such
assets without any reduction for the unpaid amount of any indebtedness incurred
by the plan in connection with the acquisition of such employer securities and
employer real property.
-
Examples.
-
Plan assets have a fair market value of $100,000. The plan has no liabilities
other than liabilities for vested benefits of participants and does not own any
employer securities or employer real property. The plan proposes to acquire
qualifying employer securities with a fair market value of $10,000 by paying
$1,000 in cash and borrowing $9,000. The fair market value of plan assets would
be $100,000 ($100,000 of plan assets less $1,000 cash payment plus $10,000 of
employer securities less $9,000 indebtedness), the fair market value of the
qualifying employer securities would be $10,000, which is 10 percent of
the fair market value of plan assets. Accordingly, the acquisition would not
contravene section 407(a).
-
Plan assets have a fair market value of $100,000. The plan has liabilities of
$20,000 which were incurred in connection with the acquisition of those assets,
and does not own any employer securities or employer real property. The plan
proposes to pay cash for qualifying employer securities with a fair market
value of $10,000. The fair market value of plan assets would be $80,000
($100,000 of plan assets less $10,000 cash payment plus $10,000 of employer
securities less $20,000 indebtedness), the fair market value of the qualifying
employer securities would be $10,000, which is 12.5 percent of the fair
market value of plan assets. Accordingly, the acquisition would contravene
section 407(a).
Department of Labor
Regulation 2550.407d-5
29 C.F.R. 2550.407d-5
"Qualifying"
Employer Security - Defined
Originally issued September 2, 1977 (42 FR 44388)
-
In General. For purposes of this section and
section 407(d)(5) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
(the Act), the term "qualifying employer security" means an employer
security which is:
-
Stock; or
-
A marketable obligation, as defined in paragraph (b) of this section and
section 407(e) of the Act.
-
For purposes of paragraph (a)(2) of this section and
section 407(d)(5) of the Act, the term "marketable
obligation" means a bond, debenture, note, or certificate, or other
evidence of indebtedness (hereinafter in this paragraph referred to as
"obligation") if:
-
Such obligation is acquired -
-
On the market, either
-
At the price of the obligation prevailing on a national securities exchange
which is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or
-
If the obligation is not traded on such a national securities exchange, at a
price not less favorable to the plan than the offering price for the obligation
as established by current bid and asked prices quoted by persons independent of
the issuer;
-
From an underwriter, at a price -
-
Not in excess of the public offering price for the obligation as set forth in a
prospectus or offering circular filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, and
-
At which a substantial portion of the same issue is acquired by persons
independent of the issuer; or
-
Directly from the issuer at a price not less favorable to the plan than the
price paid currently for a substantial portion of the same issue by persons
independent of the issuer;
-
Immediately following acquisition of such obligation,
-
Not more than 25 percent of the aggregate amount of obligations issued in
such issue and outstanding at the time of acquisition is held by the plan, and
-
At least 50 percent of the aggregate amount referred to in
paragraph (A) is held by persons independent of the issuer; and
-
Immediately following acquisition, of the obligation, not more than
25 percent of the assets of the plan is invested in obligations of the
employer or an affiliate of the employer.
Department of Labor
Regulation 2550.407d-6
29 C.F.R. 2550.407d-6
"Employee
Stock Ownership Plan" - Defined
Originally issued September 2, 1977 (42 FR 44388)
-
In General. -
-
Type of plan. To be an "ESOP" (employee stock ownership plan), a plan
described in section 407(d)(6)(A) of the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the Act) must meet the
requirements of this section. See section 407(d)(6)(B).
-
Designation as ESOP. To be an ESOP, plan must be formally designated as such in
the plan document.
-
Retroactive amendment. A plan meets the requirements of this section as of the
date that it is designated as an ESOP if it is amended retroactively to meet,
and in fact does meet, such requirements at any of the following times:
-
12 months after the date on which the plan is designated as an ESOP;
-
90 days after a determination letter is issued with respect to the
qualification of the plan as an ESOP under this section, but only if the
determination is requested by the date in paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this
section; or
-
A later date approved by the Internal Revenue Service district director.
-
Addition to other plan. An ESOP may form a portion of a plan the balance of
which includes a qualified pension, profit-sharing, or stock bonus plan which
is not an ESOP. A reference to an ESOP includes an ESOP that forms a portion of
another plan.
-
Conversion of existing plan to an ESOP. If an existing pension, profit-sharing,
or stock bonus plan is converted into an ESOP, the requirements of
section 404 of the Act, relating to fiduciary duties, and
section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code), relating to
requirements for plans established for the exclusive benefit of employees,
apply to such conversion. A conversion may constitute a termination of an
existing plan. For definition of a termination, see the regulations under
section 411(d)(3) of the Code and section 4041(f) of the Act.
-
Certain arrangements barred. (i) buy-sell agreements. An arrangement
involving an ESOP that creates a put option must not provide for the issuance
of put options other than as provided under Section
2550.408b-3(j), (k) and (l). Also, an ESOP must not otherwise
obligate itself to acquire securities from a particular security holder at an
indefinite time determined upon the happening of an event such as the death of
the holder.
-
Plan designed to invest primarily in qualifying employer securities. A plan
constitutes an ESOP only if the plan specifically states that it is designed to
invest primarily in qualifying employer securities. Thus, a stock bonus plan or
a money purchase pension plan constituting an ESOP may invest part of its
assets in other than qualifying employer securities. Such plan will be treated
the same as other stock bonus plans or money purchase pension plans qualified
under section 401(a) of the Code with respect to those investments.
-
Regulations of the secretary of the treasury. A plan constitutes an ESOP for a
plan year only if it meets such other requirements as the Secretary of the
Treasury may prescribe by regulation under section 4975(e)(7)
of the Code. See 26 C.F.R. 54.4975-11.
Department of Labor
Regulation 2550.408b-1
29 C.F.R. 2550.408b-1
Loans
to Plan Participants and Beneficiaries
Originally issued July 20, 1989 (54 FR 30520)
-
(1) In General. Section 408(b)(1)
of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the Act of
ERISA) exempts from the prohibitions of section 406(a),
406(b)(1), and 406(b)(2) loans by a
plan to parties in interest who are participants or beneficiaries of the plan,
provided that such loans:
-
Are available to all such participants and beneficiaries on a reasonably
equivalent basis;
-
Are not made available to highly compensated employees, officers or
shareholders in an amount greater than the amount made available to other
employees;
-
Are made in accordance with specific provisions regarding such loans set forth
in the plan;
-
Bear a reasonable rate of interest; and
-
Are adequately secured.
The Internal Revenue Code (the Code) contains parallel provisions to
section 408(b)(1) of the Act. Effective, December 31, 1978,
section 102 of Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978
(43 FR 47713, October 17, 1978) transferred the authority of the
Secretary of the Treasury to promulgate regulations of the type published
herein to the Secretary of Labor. Therefore, all references herein to
section 408(b)(1) of the Act should be read to include reference to the
parallel provisions of section 4975(d)(1) of
the Code.
Section 1114(b)(15)(B) of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 amended
section 408(b)(1)(B) of ERISA by deleting the phrase "highly
compensated employees, officers or shareholders" and substituting the
phrase "highly compensated employees (within the meaning of
section 414(q) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986)." Thus, for
plans with participant loan programs which are subject to the amended
section 408(b)(1)(B), the requirements of this regulation should be read
to conform with the amendment.
-
Scope. Section 408(b)(1) of the Act
does not contain an exemption from acts described in
section 406(b)(3) of the Act (prohibiting fiduciaries from
receiving consideration for their own personal account from any party dealing
with a plan in connection with a transaction involving plan assets). If a loan
from a plan to a participant who is a party in interest with respect to that
plan involves an act described in section 406(b)(3),
such an act constitutes a separate transaction which is not exempt under
section 408(b)(1) of the Act. The provisions of section 408(b)(1) are
further limited by section 408(d) of the Act (relating
to transactions with owner-employees and related persons).
-
Loans.
-
Section 408(b)(1) of the Act provides
relief from the prohibitions of section 406(a),
406(b)(1) and 406(b)(2) for the
making of a participant loan. The term "participant loan" refers to a
loan which is arranged and approved by the fiduciary administering the loan
program primarily in the interest of the participant and which otherwise
satisfies the criteria set forth in section 408(b)(1) of the Act. The
existence of a participant loan or participant loan program will be determined
upon consideration of all relevant facts and circumstances. Thus, for example,
the mere presence of a loan document appearing to satisfy the requirements of
section 408(b)(1) will not be dispositive of whether a participant loan
exists where the subsequent administration of the loan indicates that the
parties to the loan agreement did not intent the loan to be repaid. Moreover, a
loan program containing a precondition designed to benefit a party in interest
(other than the participant) is not afforded relief by section 408(b)(1)
or this regulation. In this regard, section 408(b)(1) recognizes that a
program of participant loans, like other plans investments, must be prudently
established and administered for the exclusive purpose of providing benefits to
participants and beneficiaries of the plan.
-
For the purpose of this regulation, the term "loan" will include any
renewal or modification of an existing loan agreement, provided that, at the
time of each such renewal or modification, the requirements of
section 408(b)(1) and this regulation are met.
-
Examples. The following examples illustrate the provisions of
section 2550.408b-1(a).
Example (1): T, a trustee of plan P, has exclusive discretion over the
management and disposition of plan assets. As a result, T is a fiduciary with
respect to P under section 3(21)(A) of the Act
and a party in interest with respect to P pursuant to
section 3(14)(A) of the Act. T is also a participant in P. Among
T's duties as fiduciary is the administration of a participant loan program
which meets the requirements of section 408(b)(1)
of the Act. Pursuant to strict objective criteria stated under the program, T,
who participates in all loan decisions, receives a loan on the same terms as
other participants. Although the exercise of T's discretion on behalf of
himself may constitute an act of self-dealing described in
section 406(b)(1), section 408(b)(1) provides an exemption
from section 406(b)(1). As a result, the loan from P to T would be exempt
under section 408(b)(1), provided
the conditions of that section are otherwise satisfied.
Example (2): P is a plan covering all the employees of E, the employer who
established and maintained P. F is a fiduciary with respect to P and an officer
of E. The plan documents governing P give F the authority to establish a
participant loan program in accordance with section 408(b)(1)
of the Act. Pursuant to an arrangement with E, F establishes such a
program but limits the use of loan funds to investments in a limited
partnership which is established and maintained by E as general partner. Under
these facts, the loan program and any loans made pursuant to this program are
outside the scope of relief provided by section 408(b)(1) because the loan
program is designed to operate for the benefit of E. Under the circumstance
described, the diversion of plan assets for E's benefit would also violate
sections 403(c)(1) and 404(a)
of the Act.
Example (3): Assume the same facts as in Example 2, above, except that F
does not limit the use of loan funds. However, E pressures his employees to
borrow funds under P's participant loan program and then reloan the loan
proceeds to E. F, unaware of E's activities, arranges and approves the loans.
If the loans meet all the conditions of section 408(b)(1),
such loans will be exempt under that section. However, E's activities would
cause the entire transaction to be viewed as an indirect transfer of plan
assets between P and E, who is a party in interest with respect to P, but not
the participant borrowing from P. By coercing the employees to engage in loan
transactions for its benefit, E has engaged in separate transactions that are
not exempt under section 408(b)(1). Accordingly, E would be liable for the
payment of excise taxes under section 4975
of the Code.
Example (4): Assume the same facts as in Example 2, above, except that, in
return for structuring and administering the loan program as indicated, E
agrees to pay F an amount equal to 10 percent of the funds loaned under
the program. Such a payment would result in a separate transaction not covered
by section 408(b)(1). This
transaction would be prohibited under section 406(b)(3)
since F would be receiving consideration from a party in connection with a
transaction involving plan assets.
Example (5): F is a fiduciary with respect to plan P. D is a party in interest
with respect to plan D. Section 406(a)(1)(B)
of the Act would prohibit F from causing P to lend money to D. However, F
enters into an agreement with Z, a plan participant, whereby F will cause P to
make a participant loan to Z with the express understanding that Z will
subsequently lend the loan proceeds to D. An examination of Z's credit standing
indicates that he is not creditworthy and would not, under normal
circumstances, receive a loan under the conditions established by the
participant loan program. F's decision to approve the participant loan to Z on
the basis of Z's prior agreement to lend the money to D violates the exclusive
purposes requirements of sections 403(c)
and 404(a). In effect, the entire
transaction is viewed as an indirect transfer of plan assets between P and D,
and not a loan to a participant exempt under section 408(b)(1).
Z's lack of credit standing would also cause the transaction to fail under
section 408(b)(1)(A) of the Act.
Example (6): F is a fiduciary with respect to Plan P. Z is a plan participant. Z
and D are both parties in interest with respect to P. F approves a participant
loan to Z in accordance with the conditions established under the participant
loan program. Upon receipt of the loan, Z intends to lend the money to D. If F
has approved this loan solely upon consideration of those factors which would
be considered in a normal commercial setting by an entity in the business of
making comparable loans, Z's subsequent use of the loan proceeds will not
affect the determination of whether loans under P's program satisfy the
conditions of section 408(b)(1).
Example (7): A is the trustee of a small individual account plan. D, the
president of the plan sponsor, is also a participant in the plan. Pursuant to a
participant loan program meeting the requirements of
section 408(b)(1), D applies for a loan to be secured by a parcel
of real property. D does not intent to repay the loan; rather, upon eventual
default, he will permit the property to be foreclosed upon and transferred to
the plan in discharge of his legal obligation to repay the loan. A, aware of
D's intention, approves the loan. D fails to make two consecutive quarterly
payments of principal and interest under the note evidencing the loan thereby
placing the loan in default. The plan then acquires the real property upon
foreclosure. Such facts and circumstances indicate that the payment of money
from the plan to D was not a participant loan eligible for the relief afforded
by section 408(b)(1). In effect, this transaction is a prohibited sale or
exchange of property between a plan and a party in interest from the time D
receives the money.
Example (8): Plan P establishes a participant loan program. All loans are
subject to the condition that the borrowed funds must be used to finance home
purchases. Interest rates on the loans are the same as those charged by a local
savings and loan association under similar circumstances. A loan by P to a
participant to finance a home purchase would be subject to the relief provided
by section 408(b)(1) provided that
the conditions of 408(b)(1) are met. A participant loan program which is
established to make loans for certain stated purposes (e.g., hardship,
college tuition, home purchases, etc.) but which is not otherwise designed to
benefit parties in interest (other than plan participants) would not, in
itself, cause such program to be ineligible for the relief provided by
section 408(b)(1). However, fiduciaries are cautioned that operation of a
loan program with limitations may result in loans not being made available to
all participants and beneficiaries on a reasonably equivalent basis.
-
Reasonably Equivalent Basis.
-
Loans will not be considered to have been made available to participants and
beneficiaries on a reasonably equivalent basis unless:
-
Such loans are available to all plan participants and beneficiaries without
regard to any individual's race, color, religion, sex, age or national origin:
-
In making such loans, consideration has been given only to those factors which
would be considered in a normal commercial setting by an entity in the business
of making similar types of loans. Such factors may include the applicant's
creditworthiness and financial need; and
-
An evaluation of all relevant facts and circumstances indicates that, in actual
practice, loans are not unreasonably withheld from any applicant.
-
A participant loan program will not fail the requirement of
paragraph (b)(1) of this section or section 2550.408b-1(c)
if the program establishes a minimum loan amount of up to $1,000, provided that
the loans granted meet the requirements of section 2550.408b-1(f).
-
Examples. The following examples illustrate the provisions of
section 2550.408b-1(b)(1):
Example (1): T, a trustee of plan P, has exclusive discretion over the
management and disposition of plan assets. T's duties include the
administration of a participant loan program which meets the requirements of
section 408(b)(1) of the Act. T receives a participant loan at a
lower interest rate than the rate made available to other plan participants of
similar financial condition or creditworthiness with similar security. The loan
by P to T would not be covered by the relief provided by section 408(b)(1)
because loans under P's program are not available to all plan participants on a
reasonably equivalent basis.
Example (2): Same facts as in example 1 except that T is a member of a
committee of trustees responsible for approving participant loans. T pressures
the committee to refuse loans to other qualified participants in order to
assure that the assets allocated to the participants loan program would be
available for a loan by P to T. The loan by P to T would not be covered by the
relief provided by section 408(b)(1)
since participant loans have not been made available to all participants and
beneficiaries on a reasonably equivalent basis.
Example (3): T is the trustee of plan P, which covers the employees of E. A, B
and C are employees of E, participants in P, and friends of T. The documents
governing P provide that T, in his discretion, may establish a participant loan
program meeting certain specified criteria. T institutes such a program and
tells A, B and C of his decision. Before T is able to notify P's other
participants and beneficiaries of the loan program, A, B, and C file loan
applications which, if approved, will use up substantially all of the funds set
aside for the loan program. Approval of these applications by T would represent
facts and circumstances showing that loans under P's program are not available
to all participants and beneficiaries on a reasonably equivalent basis.
-
Highly Compensated Employees.
-
Loans will not be considered to be made available to highly compensated
employees, officers or shareholders in an amount greater that the amount made
available to other employees if, upon consideration of all relevant facts and
circumstances, the program does not operate to exclude large numbers of plan
participants from receiving loans under the program.
-
A participant loan program will not fail to meet the requirement in
paragraph (c)(1), of this section, merely because the plan documents
specifically governing such loans set forth either (i) a maximum dollar
limitation, or (ii) a maximum percentage of vested accrued benefit which
no loan may exceed.
-
If the second alternative in paragraph (c)(2) of this section (maximum
percentage of vested accrued benefit) is chosen, a loan program will not fail
to meet this requirement solely because maximum loan amounts will vary directly
with the size of the participant's accrued benefit.
-
Examples. The following examples illustrate the provisions of
section 2550.408b-1(c).
Example (1): The documents governing plan P provide for the establishment of a
participant loan program in which the amount of any loan under the program
(when added to the outstanding balance of any other loans under the program to
the same participant) does not exceed the lesser of (i) $50,000, or
(ii) one-half of the present value of that participant's vested accrued
benefit under the plan (but not less than $10,000). P's participant loan
program does not fail to meet the requirement in
section 408(b)(1)(B) of the Act, and would be covered by the
relief provided by section 408(b)(1) if the other conditions of that
section are met.
Example (2): The documents governing plan T provide for the establishment of a
participant loan program in which the minimum loan amount would be $25,000. The
documents also require that the only security acceptable under the program
would be the participant's vested accrued benefit. A, the plan fiduciary
administering the loan program, finds that because of the restrictions in the
plan documents only 20 percent of the plan participants, all of whom earn
in excess of $75,000 a year, would meet the threshold qualifications for a
loan. Most of these participants are high-level supervisors or corporate
officers. Based on these facts, it appears that loans under the program would
be made available to highly compensated employees in an amount greater than the
amount made available to other employees. As a result, the loan program would
fail to meet the requirements in section 408(b)(1)(B)
of the Act and would not be covered by the relief provided in
section 408(b)(1).
-
Specific Plan Provisions. For the purpose of
section 408(b)(1) and this regulation, the Department will
consider that participant loans granted or renewed at any time prior to the
last day of the first plan year beginning on or after January 1, 1989, are
made in accordance with specific provisions regarding such loans set forth in
the plan if:
-
The plan provisions regarding such loans contain (at a minimum) an explicit
authorization for the plan fiduciary responsible for investing plan assets to
establish a participant loan program; and
-
For participant loans granted or renewed on or after the last day of the first
plan year beginning on or after January 1, 1989, the participant loan
program which is contained in the plan or in a written document forming part of
the plan includes, but need not be limited to, the following:
-
The identify of the person or positions authorized to administer the
participant loan program;
-
A procedure for applying for loans;
-
The basis on which loans will be approved or denied;
-
Limitations (if any) on the types and amount of loans offered;
-
The procedure under the program for determining a reasonable rate of interest;
-
The types of collateral which may secure a participant loan; and
-
The events constituting default and the steps that will be taken to preserve
plan assets in the event of such default.
Example (1): Plan P authorizes the trustee to establish a
participant loan program in accordance with section 408(b)1)
of the Act. Pursuant to this explicit authority, the trustee
establishes a written program which contains all of the information required by
section 2550.408b-1(d)(2).
Loans made pursuant to this authorization and the written loan program will not
fail under section 408(b)(1)(C) of the Act merely because the specific
provisions regarding such loans are contained in a separate document forming
part of the plan. The specific provisions describing the loan program whether
contained in the plan or in a written document forming part of a plan, do
affect the rights and obligations of the participants and beneficiaries under
the plan and, therefore, must in accordance with section 102(a)(1) of the
Act, be disclosed in the plan's summary plan description.
-
Reasonable Rate of Interest. A loan will be considered to bear a reasonable
rate of interest if such loan provides the plan with a return commensurate with
the rates of charged by persons in the business of lending money for loans
which would be made under similar circumstances.
Example (1): Plan P makes a participant loan to A at the fixed interest rate
of 8% for 5 years. The trustees, prior to making the loan, contacted
two local banks to determine under what terms the banks would make a similar
loan taking into account A's creditworthiness and the collateral offered. One
bank would charge a variable rate of 10% adjusted monthly for a similar
loan. The other bank would charge a fixed rate of 12% under similar
circumstances. Under these facts, the loan to A would not bear a reasonable
rate of interest because the loan did not provide P with a return commensurate
with interest rates charged by persons in the business of lending money for
loans which would be made under similar circumstances. As a result, the loan
would fail to meet the requirement of section 408(b)(1)(D)
and would not be covered by the relief provided by section 408(b)(1) if
the Act.
Example (2): Pursuant to the provisions of plan P's participant loan program, T,
the trustee of P, approves a loan to M, a participant and party in interest
with respect to P. At the time of execution, the loan meets all of the
requirements of section 408(b)(1) of the
Act. The loan agreement provides that at the end of two years M must
pay the remaining balance in full or the parties may renew for an additional
two year period. At the end of the initial two year period, the parties agree
to renew the loan for an additional two years. At the time of renewal, however,
A fails to adjust the interest rate charged on the loan in order to reflect
current economic conditions. As a result, the interest rate on the renewal
fails to provide a "reasonable rate of interest" as required by
section 408(b)(1)(D) of the Act. Under such circumstance, the loan
would not be exempt under section 408(b)(1) of the Act from the time of
renewal.
Example (3): The documents governing plan P's participant loan program provide
that loans must bear an interest rate no higher than the maximum interest rate
permitted under State X's usury law. Pursuant to the loan program, P makes a
participant loan to A, a plan participant, at a time when the interest rates
charged by financial institutions in the community (not subject to the usury
limit) for similar loans are higher than the usury limit. Under these
circumstances, the loan would not bear a reasonable rate of interest because
the loan does not provide P with a return commensurate with the interest rates
charged by persons in the business of lending money under similar
circumstances. In addition, participant loans that are artificially limited to
the maximum usury ceiling then prevailing call into question the status of such
loans under sections 403(c) and 404(a)
where higher yielding comparable investment opportunities are available to the
plan.
-
Adequate Security.
-
A loan will be considered to be adequately secured if the security posed for
such loan is something in addition to and supporting a promise to pay, which is
so pledged to the plan that it may be sold, foreclosed upon, or otherwise
disposed of upon default of repayment of the loan, the value and liquidity of
which security is such that it may reasonably be anticipated that loss of
principal or interest will not result from the loan. The adequacy of such
security will be determined in light of the type and amount of security which
would be required in the case of an otherwise identical transaction in a normal
commercial setting between unrelated parties on arms'-length terms. A
participant's vested accrued benefit under a plan may be used as security for a
participant loan to the extent of the plan's ability to satisfy the
participant's outstanding obligation in the event of default.
-
For purposes of this paragraph -
-
no more than 50% of the present value of a participant's vested accrued benefit
may be considered by a plan as security for the outstanding balance of all plan
loans made to that participant;
-
a plan will be in compliance with paragraph (f)(2)(i) of this section if,
with respect to any participant, it meets the provisions of
paragraph (f)(2)(i) of this section immediately after the origination of
each participant loan secured in whole in part by that participant's vested
accrued benefit; and
-
any loan secured in whole or in part by a portion of a participant's vested
accrued benefit must also meet the requirements of paragraph (f)(1) of
this section.
-
Effective date. This section is effective for all participant loans granted or
renewed after October 18, 1989, except with respect to
paragraph (d)(2) of this section relating to specific plan provisions.
Paragraph (d)(2) of this section is effective for participant loans
granted or renewed on or after the last day of the first plan year beginning on
or after January 1, 1989.
Department of Labor
Regulation 2550.408b-2
29 C.F.R. 2550.408b-2
Services
or Office Space Class Exemption
Originally issued June 24, 1977 (42 FR 32390)
-
In General. Section 408(b)(2) of the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the Act) exempts from
the prohibitions of section 406(a)
of the Act payment by a plan to a party in interest, including a
fiduciary, for office space or any service (or a combination of services) if
(1) such office space or service is necessary for the establishment or
operation of the plan (2) such office space or service is furnished under
a contract or arrangement which is reasonable and (3) no more than
reasonable compensation is paid for such office space or service. However,
section 408(b)(2) does not contain an exemption from acts described in
section 406(b)(1) of the Act (relating to fiduciaries dealing with
the assets of plans in their own interest or for their own account),
section 406(b)(2) of the Act (relating to fiduciaries in their
individual or in any other capacity acting in any transaction involving the
plan on behalf of a party (or representing a party) whose interests are adverse
to the interests of the plan or the interests of its participants or
beneficiaries) or section 406(b)(3) of
the Act (relating to fiduciaries receiving consideration for their own
personal account from any party dealing with a plan in connection with a
transaction involving the assets of the plan). Such acts are separate
transactions not described in section 408(b)(2).
See 2550.408b-2(e) and
(f) for guidance as to whether transactions relating to the furnishing
of office space or services by fiduciaries to plans involve acts described in
section 406(b)(1) of the Act. Section 408(b)(2) of the Act does not
contain an exemption from other provisions of the Act, such as
section 404, or other provisions of law which may impose
requirements or restrictions relating to the transactions which are exempt
under section 408(b)(2). See, for example, section 401 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1954. The provisions of section 408(b)(2) of the
Act are further limited by section 408(d) of the Act
(relating to transactions with owner-employees and related persons).
-
Necessary service. A service is
necessary for the establishment or operation of a plan within the meaning of
section 408(b)(2) of the Act and 2550.408b-2(a)(1) if the
service is appropriate and helpful to the plan obtaining the service in
carrying out the purposes for which the plan is established or maintained. A
person providing such a service to a plan (or a person who is a party in
interest solely by reason of a relationship to such a service provider
described in section 3(14)(F), (G), (H),
or (I) of the Act) may furnish goods which are necessary for the
establishment or operation of the plan in the course of, and incidental to, the
furnishing of such service to the plan.
-
Reasonable contract or arrangement.
No contract or arrangement is reasonable within the meaning of
section 408(b)(2) of the Act and 2550.408b-2(a)(2) if it does
not permit termination by the plan without penalty to the plan on reasonably
short notice under the circumstances to prevent the plan from becoming locked
into an arrangement that has become disadvantageous. A long-term lease which
may be terminated prior to its expiration (without penalty to the plan) on
reasonably short notice under the circumstances is not generally an
unreasonable arrangement merely because of its long term. A provision in a
contract or other arrangement which reasonably compensates the service provider
or lessor for loss upon early termination of the contract, arrangement or lease
is not a penalty. For example, a minimal fee in a service contract which is
charged to allow recoupment of reasonable start-up costs is not a penalty.
Similarly, a provision in a lease for a termination fee that covers reasonably
foreseeable expenses related to the vacancy and reletting of the office space
upon early termination of the lease is not a penalty. Such a provision does not
reasonably compensate for loss if it provides for payment in excess of actual
loss or if it fails to require mitigation of damages.
-
Reasonable compensation. Section 408(b)(2)
of the Act and 2550.408b-2(a)(3) permit a plan to pay a party in
interest reasonable compensation for the provision of office space or services
described in section 408(b)(2).
Section 2550.408c-2 of these regulations contains provisions
relating to what constitutes reasonable compensation for the provision of
services.
-
Transactions with fiduciaries.
-
In General. If the furnishing of office space
or a service involves an act described in section 406(b)
of the Act (relating to acts involving conflicts of interest by
fiduciaries), such an act constitutes a separate transaction which is not
exempt under section 408(b)(2) of the
Act. The prohibitions of section 406(b) supplement the other
prohibitions of section 406(a) of
the Act by imposing on parties in interest who are fiduciaries a duty
of undivided loyalty to the plans for which they act. These prohibitions are
imposed upon fiduciaries to deter them from exercising the authority, control,
or responsibility which makes such persons fiduciaries when they have interests
which may conflict with the interests of the plans for which they act. In such
cases, the fiduciaries have interests in the transactions which may affect the
exercise of their best judgment as fiduciaries. Thus, a fiduciary may not use
the authority, control, or responsibility which makes such person a fiduciary
to cause a plan to pay an additional fee to such fiduciary (or to a person in
which such fiduciary has an interest which may affect the exercise of such
fiduciary's best judgment as a fiduciary) to provide a service. Nor may a
fiduciary use such authority, control, or responsibility to cause a plan to
enter into a transaction involving plan assets whereby such fiduciary (or a
person in which such fiduciary has an interest which may affect the exercise of
such fiduciary's best judgment as a fiduciary) will receive consideration from
a third party in connection with such transaction. A person in which a
fiduciary has an interest which may affect the exercise of such fiduciary's
best judgment as a fiduciary includes, for example, a person who is a party in
interest by reason of a relationship to such fiduciary described in
section 3(14)(E), (F), (G), (H), or (I).
-
Transactions not described in
Section 406(b)(1). A fiduciary does not engage in an act described
in section 406(b)(1) of the Act if the fiduciary does not use any of the
authority, control or responsibility which makes such person a fiduciary to
cause a plan to pay additional fees for a service furnished by such fiduciary
or to pay a fee for a service furnished by a person in which such fiduciary has
an interest which may affect the exercise of such fiduciary's best judgment as
a fiduciary. This may occur, for example, when one fiduciary is retained on
behalf of a plan by a second fiduciary to provide a service for an additional
fee. However, because the authority, control or responsibility which makes a
person a fiduciary may be exercised "in effect" as well as in form,
mere approval of the transaction by a second fiduciary does not mean that the
first fiduciary has not used any of the authority, control or responsibility
which makes such person a fiduciary to cause the plan to pay the first
fiduciary an additional fee for a service. See paragraph (f) below.
-
Services without compensation. If a fiduciary
provides services to a plan without the receipt of compensation or other
consideration [other than reimbursement of direct expenses properly and
actually incurred in the performance of such services within the meaning
of 2550.408c-2(b)(3)],
the provision of such services does not, in and of itself, constitute an act
described in section 406(b) of
the Act. The allowance of a deduction to an employer under section 162
or 12 of the Code for the expense incurred in furnishing office space or
services to a plan established or maintained by such employer does not
constitute compensation or other consideration.
-
Examples. The provisions of 2550.408b-2(e)
may be illustrated by the following examples.
Example (1). E, an employer whose employees are covered by plan P, is a
fiduciary of P. I is a professional investment adviser in which E has no
interest which may affect the exercise of E's best judgment as a fiduciary. E
causes P to retain I to provide certain kinds of investment advisory services
of a type which causes I to be a fiduciary of P under
section 3(21)(A)(ii) of the Act. Thereafter, I proposes to perform
for additional fees portfolio evaluation services in addition to the services
currently provided. The provision of such services is arranged by I and
approved on behalf of the plan by E. I has not engaged in an act described in
section 406(b)(1) of the Act, because I did not use any of the
authority, control or responsibility which makes I a fiduciary (the provision
of investment advisory services) to cause the plan to pay I additional fees for
the provision of the portfolio evaluation services. E has not engaged in an act
which is described in section 406(b)(1).
E, as the fiduciary who has the responsibility to be prudent in this selection
and retention of I and the other investment advisers of the plan, has an
interest in the purchase by the plan of portfolio evaluation services. However,
such an interest is not an interest which may affect the exercise of E's best
judgment as a fiduciary.
Example (2). D, a trustee of plan P with
discretion over the management and disposition of plan assets, relies on the
advice of C, a consultant to P, as to the investment of plan assets, thereby
making C a fiduciary of the plan. On January 1, 1978, C recommends to D
that the plan purchase an insurance policy from U, an insurance company which
is not a party in interest with respect to P. C thoroughly explains the
reasons for the recommendation and makes a full disclosure concerning the fact
that C will receive a commission from U upon the purchase of the policy by P. D
considers the recommendation and approves the purchase of the policy by P. C
receives a commission. Under such circumstances, C has engaged in an act
described in section 406(b)(1) of the
Act (as well as sections 406(b)(2)
and (3) of the Act) because C is in fact exercising the authority,
control or responsibility which makes C a fiduciary to cause the plan to
purchase the policy. However, the transaction is exempt from the prohibited
transaction provisions of section 406
of the Act, if the requirements of Prohibited Transaction
Exemption 77-9 are met.
Example (3). Assume the same facts as in Example (2) except that the nature
of C's relationship with the plan is not such that C is a fiduciary of P. The
purchase of the insurance policy does not involve an act described in
section 406(b)(1) of the Act (or
sections 406(b)(2) or (3) of the Act) because such sections
only apply to acts by fiduciaries.
Example (4). E, an employer whose employees are covered by plan P, is a
fiduciary with respect to P. A, who is not a party in interest with respect to
P, persuades E that the plan needs the services of a professional investment
adviser and that A should be hired to provide the investment advice.
Accordingly, E causes P to hire A to provide investment advice of the type
which makes A a fiduciary under 2510.3-21(c)(1)(ii)(B). Prior to the
expiration of A's first contract with P, A persuades E to cause P to renew A's
contract with P to provide the same services for additional fees in view of the
increased costs in providing such services. During the period of A's second
contract, A provides additional investment advice services for which no
additional charge is made. Prior to the expiration of A's second contract, A
persuades E to cause P to renew his contract for additional fees in view of the
additional services A is providing. A has not engaged in an act described in
section 406(b)(1) of the Act, because A has not used any of the
authority, control or responsibility which makes A a fiduciary (the provision
of investment advice) to cause the plan to pay additional fees for A's
services.
Example (5). F, a trustee of plan P with discretion over the management and
disposition of plan assets, retains C to provide administrative services to P
of the type which makes C a fiduciary under section 3(21)(A)(iii).
Thereafter, C retains F to provide for additional fees actuarial and various
kinds of administrative services in addition to the services F is currently
providing to P. Both F and C have engaged in an act described in
section 406(b)(1) of the Act. F, regardless of any intent which he
may have had at the time he retained C, has engaged in such an act because F
has, in effect, exercised the authority, control or responsibility which makes
F a fiduciary to cause the plan to pay F additional fees for the services. C,
whose continued employment by P depends on F, has also engaged in such an act,
because C has an interest in the transaction which might affect the exercise of
C's best judgment as a fiduciary. As a result, C has dealt with plan assets in
his own interest under section 406(b)(1).
Example (6). F, a fiduciary of plan P with discretionary authority respecting
the management of P, retains S, the son of F, to provide for a fee various
kinds of administrative services necessary for the operation of the plan. F has
engaged in an act described in section 406(b)(1)
of the Act because S is a person in whom F has an interest which may
affect the exercise of F's best judgment as a fiduciary. Such act is not exempt
under section 408(b)(2) of the Act
irrespective of whether the provision of the services by S is exempt.
Example (7). T, one of the trustees of plan P, is president of bank B. The
bank proposes to provide administrative services to P for a fee. T physically
absents himself from all consideration of B's proposal and does not otherwise
exercise any of the authority, control or responsibility which makes T a
fiduciary to cause the plan to retain B. The other trustees decide to retain B.
T has not engaged in an act described in section 406(b)(1)
of the Act. Further, the other trustees have not engaged in an act
described in section 406(b)(1) merely because T is on the board of
trustees of P. This fact alone would not make them have an interest in the
transaction which might affect the exercise of their best judgment as
fiduciaries.
Department of Labor
Regulation 2550.408b-3
29 C.F.R. 2550.408b-3
Loans
to Employee Stock Ownership Plans
Originally issued September 2, 1977 (42 FR 44385)
Technical corrections September 13, 1977 (42 FR 45907)
Amended April 30, 1984 (49 FR 18295)
-
Definitions. When used in this section, the terms listed below have the
following meanings:
-
ESOP. The term "ESOP" refers to an employee stock ownership plan that
meets the requirements of section 407(d)(6) of the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the Act) and
29 C.F.R. 2550.407d-6. It is not synonymous with "stock
bonus plan." A stock bonus plan must, however, be an ESOP to engage in an
exempt loan. The qualification of an ESOP under section 401(a) of the
Internal Revenue Code (the Code) and 26 C.F.R. 54.4975-11
will not be adversely affected merely because it engages in a non-exempt loan.
-
Loan. The term "loan" refers to a loan made to an ESOP by a party in
interest or a loan to an ESOP which is guaranteed by a party in interest. It
includes a direct loan of cash, a purchase-money transaction, and an assumption
of the obligation of the ESOP. "Guarantee" includes an unsecured
guarantee and the use of assets of a party in interest as collateral for a
loan, even though the use of assets may not be a guarantee under applicable
state law. An amendment of a loan in order to qualify as an exempt loan is not
a refinancing of the loan or the making of another loan.
-
Exempt Loan. The term "exempt loan" refers to a loan that satisfies
the provisions of this section. A "non-exempt loan" is one that fails
to satisfy such provisions.
-
Pubicly traded. The term "publicly traded" refers to a security that
is listed on a national securities exchange registered under section 6 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78f) or that is quoted on a
system sponsored by a national securities association registered under
section 15A(b) of the Securities Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78o).
-
Qualifying Employer Security. The term "qualifying employer security"
refers to a security described in 29 C.F.R. 2550.407d-5.
-
Statutory Exemption -
-
Scope. Section 408(b)(3) of the Act
provides an exemption from the prohibited transaction provisions of
sections 406(a) and 406(b)(1) of the
Act (relating to fiduciaries dealing with the assets of plans in their
own interest or for their own account) and 406(b)(2)
of the Act (relating to fiduciaries in their individual or in any other
capacity acting in any transaction involving the plan on behalf of a party (or
representing a party) whose interests are adverse to the interests of the plan
or the interests of its participants or beneficiaries). Section 408(b)(3)
does not provide an exemption from the prohibitions of
section 406(b)(3) of the Act (relating to fiduciaries receiving
consideration for their own personal account from any party dealing with a plan
in connection with a transaction involving the income or assets of the plan).
-
Special scrutiny of transaction. The
exemption under section 408(b)(3) includes
within its scope certain transactions in which the potential for self-dealing
by fiduciaries exists and in which the interests of fiduciaries may conflict
with the interests of participants. To guard against these potential abuses,
the Department of Labor will subject these transactions to special scrutiny to
ensure that they are primarily for the benefit of participants and their
beneficiaries. Although the transactions need not be arranged and approved by
an independent fiduciary, fiduciaries are cautioned to scrupulously exercise
their discretion in approving them. For example, fiduciaries should be prepared
to demonstrate compliance with the net effect test and the arm's-length
standard under paragraphs (c)(2) and (3) of this section. Also, fiduciaries
should determine that the transaction is truly arranged primarily in the
interest of participants and their beneficiaries rather than, for example, in
the interest of certain selling shareholders.
-
Primary benefit requirement --
-
In General. An exempt loan must be primarily for the benefit of the ESOP
participants and their beneficiaries. All the surrounding facts and
circumstances, including those described in paragraphs (c)(2) and (3) of this
section, will be considered in determining whether such loan satisfies this
requirement. However, no loan will satisfy such requirement unless it satisfies
the requirements of paragraphs (d), (e) and (f) of this section.
-
Net effect on plan assets. At the time that a loan is made, the interest rate
for the loan and the price of securities to be acquired with the loan proceeds
should not be such that plan assets might be drained off (Emphasis
added).
-
Arm's-length standard. The terms of a loan, whether or not between independent
parties, must, at the time the loan is made, be at least as favorable to the
ESOP as the terms of a comparable loan resulting from arm's-length negotiations
between independent parties.
-
Use of loan proceeds. The proceeds of an exempt loan must be used, within a
reasonable time after their receipt, by the borrowing ESOP only for any or all
of the following purposes:
-
To acquire qualifying employer securities.
-
To repay such loan.
-
To repay a prior exempt loan. A new loan, the proceeds of which are so used,
must satisfy the provisions of this section. Except as provided in paragraphs
(i) and (j) of this section or as otherwise required by applicable law, no
security acquired with the proceeds of an exempt loan may be subject to a put,
call, or other option, or buy-sell or similar arrangement while held by and
when distributed from a plan, whether or not the plan is then an ESOP.
-
Liability and collateral of ESOP for loan. An exempt loan must be without
recourse against the ESOP. Furthermore, the only assets of the ESOP that may be
given as collateral on an exempt loan are qualifying employer securities of two
classes: those acquired with the proceeds of the exempt loan and those that
were used as collateral on a prior exempt loan repaid with the proceeds of the
current exempt loan. No person entitled to payment under the exempt loan shall
have any right to assets of the ESOP other than:
-
Collateral given for the loan,
-
Contributions (other than contributions of employer securities) that are made
under an ESOP to meet its obligations under the loan, and
-
Earnings attributable to such collateral and the investment of such
contributions.
The payments made with respect to an exempt loan by the ESOP
during a plan year must not exceed an amount equal to the sum of such
contributions and earnings received during or prior to the year less such
payments in prior years. Such contributions and earnings must be accounted for
separately in the books of account of the ESOP until the loan is repaid.
-
Default. In the event of default upon an exempt loan, the value of plan assets
transferred in satisfaction of the loan must not exceed the amount of default.
If the lender is a party in interest, a loan must provide for a transfer of
plan assets upon default only upon and to the extent of the failure of the plan
to meet the payment schedule of the loan. For purposes of this paragraph, the
making of a guarantee does not make a person a lender.
-
Reasonable rate of interest. The interest rate
of a loan must not be in excess of a reasonable rate of interest. All relevant
factors will be considered in determining a reasonable rate of interest,
including the amount and duration of the loan, the security and guarantee (if
any) involved, the credit standing of the ESOP and the guarantor (if any), and
the interest rate prevailing for comparable loans. When these factors are
considered, a variable interest rate may be reasonable.
-
Release from encumbrance --
-
General rule. In general, an exempt loan must provide for the release from
encumbrance of plan assets used as collateral for the loan under this
paragraph. For each plan year during the duration of the loan, the number of
securities released must equal the number of encumbered securities held
immediately before release for the current plan year multiplied by a fraction.
The numerator of the fraction is the amount of principal and interest paid for
the year. The denominator of the fraction is the sum of the numerator plus the
principal and interest to be paid for all future years. See Section
2550.408b-3(h)(4). The number of future years under the loan must be definitely
ascertainable and must be determined without taking into account any possible
extensions or renewal periods. If the interest rate under the loan is variable,
the interest to be paid in future years must be computed by using the interest
rate applicable as of the end of the plan year. If collateral includes more
than one class of securities, the number of securities of each class to be
released for a plan year must be determined by applying the same fraction to
each class.
-
Special rule. A loan will not fail to be exempt merely because the number of
securities to be released from encumbrance is determined solely with reference
to principal payments. However, if release is determined with reference to
principal payments only, the following three additional rules apply. The first
rule is that the loan must provide for annual payments of principal and
interest at a cumulative rate that is not less rapid at any time than level
annual payments of such amounts for 10 years. The second rule is that interest
included in any payment is disregarded only to the extent that it would be
determined to be interest under standard loan amortization tables. The third
rule is that subdivision (2) is not applicable from the time that, by reason of
a renewal, extension, or refinancing, the sum of the expired duration of the
exempt loan, the renewal period, the extension period, and the duration of a
new exempt loan exceeds 10 years.
-
Caution against plan disqualification. Under an exempt loan, the number of
securities released from encumbrance may vary from year to year. The release of
securities depends upon certain employer contributions and earnings under the
ESOP. Under 26 C.F.R. 54.4975-11(d)(2)
actual allocations to participants' accounts are based upon assets withdrawn
from the suspense account. Nevertheless, for purposes of applying the
limitations under section 415 of the Code to these allocations, under
26 C.F.R. 54.4975-11(a)(8)(ii) contributions used by the ESOP
to pay the loan are treated as annual additions to participants' accounts.
Therefore, particular caution must be exercised to avoid exceeding the maximum
annual additions under section 415 of the Code. At the same time, release
from encumbrance in annually varying numbers may reflect a failure on the part
of the employer to make substantial and recurring contributions to the ESOP
which will lead to loss of qualification under section 401(a) of the Code.
The Internal Revenue Service will observe closely the operation of ESOPs that
release encumbered securities in varying annual amounts, particularly those
that provide for the deferral of loan payments or for balloon payments. See
26 C.F.R. 54.4975-7(b)(8)(iii).
-
Illustration. The general rule under paragraph (h)(1) of this section
operates as illustrated in the following example:
Example. Corporation X establishes an ESOP that borrows $750,000 from a bank. X
guarantees the loan which is for 15 years at 5% interest and is payable in
level annual amounts of $72,256.72. Total payments on the loan are
$1,083,850.80. The ESOP uses the entire proceeds of the loan to acquire 15,000
shares of X stock which is used as collateral for the loan. The number of
securities to be released for the first year is 1,000 shares,
i.e., 15,000 shares x $72,256.72/$1,083,850.80 = 15,000 shares x 1/15. The
number of securities to be released for the second year is 1,000 shares, i.e.,
14,000 shares x $72,256.72/$1,011,594.08 = 14,000 shares x 1/14. If all loan
payments are made as originally scheduled, the number of securities released in
each succeeding year of the loon will also be 1,000.
-
Right of first refusal. Qualifying employer securities acquired with proceeds
of an exempt loan may, but need not, be subject to a right of first refusal.
However, any such right must meet the requirements of this paragraph.
Securities subject to such right must be stock or an equity security, or a debt
security convertible into stock or an equity security. Also, they must not be
publicly traded at the time the right may be exercised. The right of first
refusal must be in favor of the employer, the ESOP, or both in any order of
priority. The selling price and other terms under the right must not be less
favorable to the seller than the greater of the value of the security
determined under 26 C.F.R. 54.4975-11(d)(5),
or the purchase price and other terms offered by a buyer, other than the
employer or the ESOP, making a good faith offer to purchase the security. The
right of first refusal must lapse no later than 14 days after the security
holder gives written notice to the holder of the right that an offer by a third
party to purchase the security has been received.
-
Put option. A qualifying employer security acquired with the proceeds of an
exempt loan by an ESOP after September 30, 1976, must be subject to a put
option if it is not publicly traded when distributed or if it is subject to a
trading limitation when distributed. For purposes of this paragraph, a
"trading limitation" on a security is a restriction under any Federal
or State securities law or any regulation thereunder, or an agreement (not
prohibited by this section) affecting the security which would make the
security not as freely tradable as one not subject to such restriction. The put
option must be exercisable only by a participant, by the participant's
donee(s), or by a person (including an estate or its distributes) to whom the
security passes by reason of a participant's death. (Under this paragraph
"participant" means a participant and the beneficiaries of the
participant under the ESOP.) The put option must permit a participant to put
the security to the employer. Under no circumstances may the put option bind
the ESOP. However, it may grant the ESOP an option to assume the rights and
obligations of the employer at the time that the put option is exercised. If it
is known at the time a loan is made that Federal or state law will be violated
by the employer's honoring such option, the put option must permit the security
to be put, in a manner consistent with such law, to a third party (e.g., an
affiliate of the employer or a shareholder other than the ESOP) that has
substantial net worth at the time the loan is made and whose net worth is
reasonably expected to remain substantial.
-
Duration of put option. --
-
General rule. A put option must be exercisable at least during a 15-month
period which begins the date the security subject to the put option is
distributed by the ESOP.
-
Special rule. In the case of a security that is publicly traded without
restriction when distributed but ceases to be so traded within 15 months after
distribution, the employer must notify each security holder in writing on or
before the tenth day after the date the security ceases to be so traded that
for the remainder of the 15-month period the security is subject to a put
option. The number of days between the tenth day and the date on which notice
is actually given, if later than the tenth day, must be added to the duration
of the put option. The notice must inform distributee(s) of the terms of the
put options that they are to hold. The terms must satisfy the requirements of
paragraphs (j) through (i) of this section.
-
Other put option provisions. --
-
Manner of exercise. A put option is exercised by the holder notifying the
employer in writing that the put option is being exercised.
-
Time excluded from duration of put option. The period during which a put option
is exercisable does not include any time when a distributee is unable to
exercise it because the party bound by the put option is prohibited from
honoring it by applicable Federal or state law.
-
Price. The price at which a put option must be exercisable is the value of the
security, determined in accordance with paragraph (d)(5)
of 26 C.F.R. 54.4975-11.
-
Payment terms. The provisions for payment under a put option must be
reasonable. The deferral of payment is reasonable if adequate security and a
reasonable interest rate are provided for any credit extended and if the
cumulative payments at any time are no less than the aggregate of reasonable
periodic payments as of such time. Periodic payments are reasonable if annual
installments, beginning with 30 days after the date the put option is
exercised, are substantially equal. Generally, the payment period may not end
more than 5 years after the date the put option is exercised. However, it may
be extended to a date no later than the earlier of 10 years from the date the
put option is exercised or the date the proceeds of the loan used by the ESOP
to acquire the security subject to such put option are entirely repaid.
-
Payment restrictions. Payment under a put option may be restricted by the terms
of a loan, including one used to acquire a security subject to a put option,
made before November 1, 1977. Otherwise, payment under a put option must
not be restricted by the provisions of a loan or any other arrangement,
including the terms of the employer's articles of incorporation, unless so
required by applicable state law.
-
Other terms of loan. An exempt loan must be for a specific term. Such loan may
not be payable at the demand of any person, except in the case of default.
-
Status of paln as ESOP. To be exempt, a loan must be made to a plan that is an
ESOP at the time of such loan. However, a loan to a plan formally designated as
an ESOP at the time of the loan that fails to be an ESOP because it does not
comply with section 401 (a) of the Code or 26 C.F.R. 54.4975-11
will be exempt as of the time of such loan if the plan is amended retroactively
under section 401(b) of the Code or 26 C.F.R. 54.4975-11(a)(4).
-
Special rules for certain loans. --
-
Loans made before January 1, 1976. A loan made before January 1,
1976, or made afterwards under a binding agreement in effect on January 1,
1976 (or under renewals permitted by the terms of such an agreement on that
date) is exempt for the entire period of such loan if it otherwise satisfies
the provisions of this section for such period, even though it does not satisfy
the following provisions of this section:
-
The last sentence of paragraph (d);
-
Paragraphs (e), (f), and (h)(1) and (2); and
-
Paragraphs (i) through (m), inclusive.
-
Loans made after December 31, 1975, BUT BEFORE November 1, 1977. A
loan made after December 31, 1975, but before November 1, 1977, or
made afterwards under a binding agreement in effect on November 1, 1977,
(or under renewals permitted by the terms of such an agreement on that date) is
exempt for the entire period of such loan if it otherwise satisfies the
provisions of this section for such period even though it does not satisfy the
following provisions of this section:
-
Paragraph (f);
-
The three provisions of paragraph (h)(2): and
-
Paragraph (i).
-
Release rule. Notwithstanding paragraphs (o)(1) and (2) of this section, if the
proceeds of a loan are used to acquire securities after November 1, 1977,
the loan must comply by such date with the provisions of paragraph (h) of
this section.
-
Default rule. Notwithstanding paragraphs (o)(1) and (2) of this section, a loan
by a party in interest other than a guarantor must satisfy the requirements of
paragraph (f) of this section. A loan will satisfy these requirements if
it is retroactively amended before November 1, 1977, to satisfy these
requirements.
-
Put option rule. With respect to a security distributed before November 1,
1977, the put option provisions of paragraphs (j), (k), and (l) of this section
will be deemed satisfied as of the date the security is distributed if by
December 31, 1977, the security is subject to a put option satisfying such
provisions. For purposes of satisfying such provisions, the security will be
deemed distributed on the date the put option is issued. However, the put
option provisions need not be satisfied with respect to a security that is not
owned on November 1, 1977, by a person in whose hands a put option must be
exercisable.
Department of Labor
Regulation 2550.408b-4
29 C.F.R. 2550.408b-4
Investment
in Own-Bank Interest-Bearing Deposits
Originally issued June 24, 1977 (42 FR 32392)
-
In General.
Section 408(b)(4) of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974 (the Act) exempts from the prohibition of
Section 406 of the Act the investment of all or a part of a plan's assets
in deposits bearing a reasonable rate of interest in a bank or similar
financial institution supervised by the United States or a State, even though
such bank or similar financial institution is a fiduciary or other party in
interest with respect to the plan, if the conditions of either
Part 2550.408b-4(b)(1) or Part 2550.408b-4(b)(2)
are met.
Section 408(b)(4) provides an exemption from
Section 406(b)(1) of the Act (relating to fiduciaries dealing with
the assets of plans in their own interest or for their own account) and
406(b)(2) of the Act (relating to fiduciaries in their individual or in
any other capacity acting in any transaction involving the plan on behalf of a
party -- or representing a party -- whose interests are adverse to the
interests of the plan or the interests of its participants or beneficiaries),
as well as Section 406(a)(1),
because Section 408(b)(4) contemplates a bank or similar financial
institution causing a plan for which it acts as a fiduciary to invest plan
assets in its own deposits if the requirements of Section 408(b)(4) are
met.
However, it does not provide an exemption from
Section 406(b)(3) of the Act (relating to fiduciaries receiving
consideration for their own personal account from any part dealing with a plan
in connection with a transaction involving the assets of the plan). The receipt
of such consideration is a separate transaction not described in the statutory
exemption. Section 408(b)(4) does not
contain an exemption from other provisions of the Act, such as
Section 404, or other provisions of law which may impose requirements or
restrictions relating to the transactions which are exempt under
Section 408(b)(4) of the Act. See, for example, Section 401 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (Code). The provisions of Section 408(b)(4)
of the Act are further limited by Section 408(d) of the Act (relating to
transactions with owner-employees and related persons).
-
(1) Plan Covering Own Employees.
Such investment may be made if the plan is one which covers only the employees
of the bank or similar financial institution, the employees of any of its
affiliates, or the employees of both.
(2) Other Plans.
Such investment may be made if -
-
The investment is expressly authorized by a provision of the plan or trust
instrument, or
-
The investment is expressly authorized (or made) by a fiduciary of the plan
(other than the bank or similar financial institution or any of its affiliates)
who has authority to make such investments, or to instruct the trustee or other
fiduciary with respect to investments, and who has no interest in the
transaction which may affect the exercise of such authorizing fiduciary's best
judgment as a fiduciary so as to cause such authorization to constitute an act
described in Section 406(b) of the Act.
Any authorization to make investments contained in a plan or trust instrument
will satisfy the requirement of express authorization for investments made
prior to November 1, 1977.
Effective November 1, 1977, in the case of a bank or similar financial
institution that invests plan assets in deposits in itself or its affiliates
under an authorization contained in a plan or trust instrument, such
authorization -
-
Must name such bank or similar financial institution, and
-
Must state that such bank or similar financial institution may make investments
in deposits which bear a reasonable rate of interest in itself (or in an
affiliate).
(3) Example.
B, a bank, is the trustee of plan P's assets. The trust instruments give the
trustees the right to invest plan assets in its discretion. B invests in the
certificates of deposit of bank C, which is a fiduciary of the plan by virtue
of performing certain custodial and administrative services. The authorization
is sufficient for the plan to make such an investment under
Section 408(b)(4). Further, such authorization would suffice to
allow B to make investments in deposits in itself prior to November 1,
1977. However subsequent to October 31, 1977, B may not invest in deposits
in itself, unless the plan or trust instrument authorizes it to invest in
deposits of B.
-
Definitions.
-
The term "bank or similar
financial institutions" . . . includes a bank (as defined in Section 581
of the Code), a domestic building and loan association (as defined in
Section 7701(a)(19) of the Code) . . .
-
A person is an "affiliate" of a bank or similar financial institution
if such person and such bank or similar financial institution would be treated
as members of the same controlled group of corporations or as members of two or
more trades or businesses under common control within the meaning of
Section 414(b) or (c) of the Code and regulations thereunder.
-
The term "deposits" includes any account, temporary or otherwise,
upon which a reasonable rate of interest is paid, including a certificate of
deposit issued by a bank or similar financial institution.
Note: Also refer to ERISA Section 408(b)(4),
"Investment in Own-Bank Interest-Bearing Deposits".
Department of Labor
Regulation 2550.408b-6
29 C.F.R. 2550.408b-6
Ancillary
Services by Banks or Similar Financial Institutions
Originally issued June 24, 1977 (42 FR 32392)
Technical corrections of July 18, 1977 (42 FR 36823)
did not contain any changes to this regulation
-
In General. Section 408(b)(6) of
the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the Act) exempts
from the prohibitions of section 406
of the Act the provision of certain ancillary services by a bank or
similar financial institution (as defined in 2550.408b-4(c)(1))
supervised by the United States or a State to a plan for which it acts as a
fiduciary if the conditions of 2550.408b-6(b)
are met. Such ancillary services include services which do not meet the
requirements of section 408(b)(2) of the Act because the provision of such
services involves an act described in section 406(b)(1)
of the Act (relating to fiduciaries dealing with the assets of plans in
their own interest or for their own account) by the fiduciary bank or similar
financial institution or an act described in section 406(b)(2)
of the Act (relating to fiduciaries in their individual or in any other
capacity acting in any transaction involving the plan on behalf of a party (or
representing a party) whose interests are adverse to the interests of the plan
or the interests of its participants or beneficiaries). Section 408(b)(6)
provides an exemption from sections 406(b)(1)
and (2) because section 408(b)(6) contemplates the provision
of such ancillary services without the approval of a second fiduciary (as
described in 2550.408b-2(e)(2)) if the
conditions of 2550.408b-6(b) are met. Thus, for example, plan assets held by a
fiduciary bank which are reasonably expected to be needed to satisfy current
plan expenses may be placed by the bank in a non-interest-bearing checking
account in the bank if the conditions of 2550.408b-6(b) are met,
notwithstanding the provisions of section 408(b)(4)
of the Act (relating to investments in bank deposits). However,
section 408(b)(6) does not provide an exemption for an act described in
section 406(b)(3) of the Act (relating to fiduciaries receiving
consideration for their own personal account from any party dealing with a plan
in connection with a transaction involving the assets of the plan). The receipt
of such consideration is a separate transaction not described in
section 408(b)(6). Section 408(b)(6) does not contain an exemption
from other provisions of the Act, such as section 404,
or other provisions of law which may impose requirements or restrictions
relating to the transactions which are exempt under section 408(b)(6) of
the Act. See, for example, section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1954. The provisions of section 408(b)(6) of the Act are further limited
by section 408(d) of the Act (relating to
transactions with owner-employees and related persons).
-
Conditions. Such service must be
provided -
-
At not more than reasonable compensation;
-
Under adequate internal safeguards which assure that the provision of such
service is consistent with sound banking and financial practice, as determined
by Federal or State supervisory authority; and
-
Only to the extent that such service is subject to specific guidelines issued
by the bank or similar financial institution which meet the requirements of
2550.408b-6(c).
-
Specific guidelines. (Reserved)
Department of Labor
Regulation 2550.408c-2
29 C.F.R. 2550.408c-2
Compensation
for Services
Originally issued June 24, 1977 (42 FR 32393)
-
In General. Section 408(b)(2) of the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the Act) refers to the
payment of reasonable compensation by a plan to a party in interest for
services rendered to the plan. Section 408(c)(2)
of the Act and Section 2550.408c-2(b)(1) through 2550.408c-2(b)(4)
clarify what constitutes reasonable compensation for such services.
-
(1) General Rule. Generally, whether compensation is "reasonable"
under sections 408(b)(2) and 408(c)(2)
of the Act depends on the particular facts and circumstances of each
case.
-
Payments to certain fiduciaries. Under sections 408(b)(2)
and 408(c)(2) of the Act,
the term "reasonable compensation" does not include any compensation
to a fiduciary who is already receiving full-time pay from an employer or
association of employers (any of whose employees are participants in the plan)
or from an employee organization (any or whose members are participants in the
plan), except for the reimbursement of direct expenses properly and actually
incurred and not otherwise reimbursed. The restrictions of this
paragraph (b)(2) do not apply to a party in interest who is not a
fiduciary.
-
Certain expenses not direct expenses. An expense is not a direct expense to the
extent it would have been sustained had the service not been provided or if it
represents an allocable portion of overhead costs.
-
Expense advances. Under sections 408(b)(2)
and 408(c)(2) of the Act,
the term "reasonable compensation" , as applied to a fiduciary or an
employee of a plan, includes an advance to such a fiduciary or employee by the
plan to cover direct expenses to be properly and actually incurred by such
person in the performance of such person's duties with the plan if:
-
The amount of such advance is reasonable with respect to the amount of the
direct expense which is likely to be properly and actually incurred in the
immediate future (such as during the next month) and
-
The fiduciary or employee accounts to the plan at the end of the period covered
by the advance for the expenses properly and actually incurred.
-
Excessive compensation. Under sections 408(b)(2)
and 408(c)(2) of the Act, any
compensation which would be considered excessive under
26 C.F.R. 1.162-7 (Income Tax Regulations relating to compensation
for personal services which constitutes an ordinary and necessary trade or
business expense) will not be "reasonable compensation". Depending
upon the facts and circumstances of the particular situation, compensation
which is not excessive under 26 C.F.R. 1.162-7 may, nevertheless, not
be "reasonable compensation" within the meaning of
sections 408(b)(2) and 408(c)(2) of the Act.
Department of Labor
Regulation 2550.408e
29 C.F.R. 2550.408e
Qualifying
Employer Securities and Real Estate
Acquisition or Sale of Qualifying Employer Securities
Acquisition/Sale/Lease of Qualifying Employer Real Estate
Originally issued August 1, 1980 (45 FR 51197)
-
In General. Section 408(e) of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974 (the Act) exempts from the prohibitions of
section 406(a) and 406(b)(1)
and (2) of the Act any acquisition or sale by a plan of qualifying
employer securities (as defined in section 407(d)(5)
of the Act), or any acquisition, sale or lease by a plan of qualifying
employer real property (as defined in
section 407(d)(4) of the Act) if certain conditions are met. The
conditions are that:
-
The acquisition, sale or lease must be for adequate consideration (which is
defined in paragraph (d) of this section);
-
No commission may be charged directly or indirectly to the plan with respect to
the transaction; and
-
In the case of an acquisition or lease of qualifying employer real property, or
an acquisition of qualifying the securities, by a plan other than an eligible
individual account plan (as defined in section 407(d)(3)
of the Act), the acquisition or lease must comply with the requirements
of section 407(a) of the Act.
-
Acquisition. For purposes of
section 408(e) and this section, an acquisition by a plan of
qualifying employer securities or qualifying employer real property shall
include, but not be limited to, an acquisition by purchase, by the exchange of
plan assets, by the exercise of warrants or rights, by the conversion of a
security, by default of a loan where the qualifying employer security or
qualifying employer real property was security for the loan, or in connection
with the contribution of such securities or real property to the plan. However,
an acquisition of a security shall not be deemed to have occurred if a plan
acquires the security as a result of a stock dividend or stock split.
-
Sale. For purposes of section 408(e) and this
section, a sale of qualifying employer real property or qualifying employer
securities shall include any disposition for value.
-
Adequate consideration. For purposes of section 408(e)
and this section, adequate consideration means:
-
In the case of a marketable obligation, a price not less favorable to the plan
than the pr
|