Home > Regulation & Examinations > Bank Examinations > FDIC Enforcement Decisions and Orders |
|||
FDIC Enforcement Decisions and Orders |
|
Board denies motion for reconsideration of its decision in ¶5166A.
[.1] Practice and ProcedureReconsiderationStandard
Reconsideration is granted only when petitioner states a valid reason for it, and sets forth relevant information that for good cause was not previously set forth.
In the Matter of
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") initiated this cease and desist proceeding on August 10, 1990 pursuant to section 8(b) and 8(c) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act ("FDI Act"), 12 U.S.C. § 1818(b) and (c). The Notice of Charges and of Hearing ("Notice") named First Pacific Bank, Beverly Hills, California ("Bank"), and certain individual Respondents, including Janice J. France, its chief executive officer, Berrien E. Moore, Ada P. Sands, and Leonard S. Sands ("Respondents"). The Notice was also issued to four law firms, including the law firms of Christensen, White, Miller, Fink & Jacobs and Crowley & Cuneo ("respondent law firms").1 The Notice alleged that a total of $180,000 had been transferred from the Bank to the law firms with knowledge that the FDIC considered the Bank to be in an insolvent condition and subject to imminent closure by the state.
[.1] In order for a party to seek reconsideration from the Board, the Motion for Reconsideration must 1) specify the reasons why the Board should reconsider its decision and 2) set forth relevant information that for good cause shown was not previously set forth. 12 C.F.R. § 308.44(b). Respondents' and respondent law firms' motions must be denied because they fail to state any valid reasons why the Board should
For the foregoing reasons, the Board denies the Respondents' and respondent law firms' Motions for Reconsideration.
The Board, having reviewed the record and the applicable law, hereby orders that the Motions for Reconsideration are denied. |
|
Last Updated 6/6/2003 | legal@fdic.gov |