Each depositor insured to at least $250,000 per insured bank



Home > Regulation & Examinations > Bank Examinations > FDIC Enforcement Decisions and Orders




FDIC Enforcement Decisions and Orders

ED&O Home | Search Form | Text Search | ED&O Help


{{4-30-95 p.C-3930}}
   [11,125] In the Matter of Dennis R. Peterson, Omnibank of Connecticut, Inc., New London, Connecticut, and Bank of Southeastern Connecticut, Waterford, Connecticut, Docket No. FDIC-95-1e (2-13-95).

   Respondent prohibited from participating in the conduct of affairs of, or exercising voting rights in, any insured institution without the prior consent of the FDIC.

   [.1] Prohibition—Participation in Conduct of Affairs
   [.2] Prohibition—Exercise of Voting Rights

In the Matter of
DENNIS R. PETERSON, Individually
and as an Office and/or
Person Participating in the
Conduct of the Affairs of
OMNIBANK OF CONNECTICUT,
INC.

NEW LONDON, CONNECTICUT
BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN
CONNECTICUT

WATERFORD, CONNECTICUT
(Insured State Nonmember Bank)
ORDER OF PROHIBITION FROM
FURTHER PARTICIPATION

FDIC-95-1e

   DENNIS R. PETERSON ("Respondent") has been advised of the right to receive a NOTICE OF INTENTION TO PROHIBIT FROM FURTHER PARTICIPATION ("NOTICE") issued by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") detailing the violations, unsafe or unsound banking practices, and/or breaches of fiduciary duty for which an ORDER OF PROHIBITION FROM FURTHER PARTICIPATION ("ORDER") may issue, and has been further advised of the right to a hearing on the alleged charges under §8(e) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act ("Act"), 12 U.S.C.A. §1818(e) (1982) and (1989) and the FDIC's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 12 C.F.R. Part 308. Having waived those rights, the Respondent entered into a STIPULATION AND CONSENT TO THE ISSUANCE OF AN ORDER OF PROHIBITION FROM FURTHER PARTICIPATION ("CONSENT AGREEMENT") with a representative of the Legal Division of the FDIC, whereby solely for the purpose of this proceeding and without admitting or denying any violations, unsafe or unsound banking practices, and/or any breaches of fiduciary duty, Respondent consented to the issuance of an ORDER by the FDIC.

   The FDIC considered the matter and determined it had reason to believe that:

{{12-31-96 p.C-3931}}
   (a) The Respondent has engaged or participated in violations, unsafe or unsound banking practices, and/or breaches of fiduciary duty as an officer and person participating in the conduct of the affairs of OmniBank, New London, Connecticut and Bank of Southeastern Connecticut, Waterford, Connecticut;

   (b) By reason of such violations, practices and/or breaches of fiduciary duty, the Bank has suffered or will probably suffer substantial financial loss or other damage, and

   (c) Such violations, practices and/or breaches of fiduciary duty involve personal dishonesty on the part of the Respondent or demonstrate the Respondent's willful and/or continuing disregard for safety or soundness of the Bank.

   The FDIC further determined that such violations, practices and/or breaches of fiduciary duty demonstrate the Respondent's unfitness to serve as a director, officer, person participating in the conduct of the affairs or as an institution-affiliated party of the Bank, any other insured depository institution, or any other agency or organization enumerated in § 8(e)(7)(A) of the Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1818(e)(7)(A).

   The FDIC, therefore, accepted the CONSENT AGREEMENT and issued the following:

ORDER OF PROHIBITION FROM FURTHER PARTICIPATION

   [.1] 1. DENNIS R. PETERSON is hereby prohibited from:

       (a) participating in any manner in the conduct of the affairs of any financial institution or organization enumerated in § 8(e)(7)(A) of the Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1818 (e)(7)(A);

       [.2] (b) soliciting, procuring, transferring, attempting to transfer, voting, or attempting to vote any proxy, consent or authorization with respect to any voting rights in any financial institution enumerated in § 8(e)(7)(A) of the Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1818(e)(7)(A);

       (c) violating any voting agreement previously approved by the appropriate Federal banking agency; or

       (d) voting for a director, or serving or acting as an institution-affiliated party.

   2. This ORDER will become effective ten (10) days after its issuance. The provisions of this ORDER will remain effective and enforceable except to the extent that, and until such time as, any provision of this ORDER shall have been modified, terminated, suspended, or set aside by the FDIC.

   Dated this 13th day of February, 1995.

   Pursuant to delegated authority.

ED&O Home | Search Form | Text Search | ED&O Help

Last Updated 6/6/2003 legal@fdic.gov