 |
 |
 |
Home |  |
Deposit Insurance | |
Consumer Protection | |
Industry Analysis | |
Regulations & Examinations | |
Asset Sales | |
News & Events | |
About FDIC | |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Home > Industry Analysis > Research & Analysis > Working Paper Series > Bank Loan Underwriting Practices: Can Examiners’ Risk Assessments Contribute to Early-Warning Systems? |
|
|
|
|||
|
Bank Loan Underwriting Practices: Can Examiners’ Risk Assessments Contribute to Early-Warning Systems? |
|
|
A bar chart that shows the percent correct of composite CAMELS rating prediction. In 1997, Specification 1 was 62.1 percent. Specification 2 was 67.8 percent. Specification 3 was 84.7 percent. Specification 4 was 85.2 percent. In 1998, Specification 1 was 68.8 percent. Specification 2 was 73.6 percent. Specification 3 was 84.6 percent. Specification 4 was 84.5 percent. In 2000, Specification 1 is 66.9 percent. Specification 2 was 72.4 percent. Specification 3 was 84.6 percent. Specification 4 was 84.5 percent. In 2001, Specification 1 was 69.2 percent. Specification 2 was 71.3 percent. Specification 3 was 82.8 percent. Specification 4 was 82.2 percent.
|
|
|
| Home Contact Us Search Help SiteMap Forms Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Service Center Website Policies USA.gov |
| FDIC Office of Inspector General |