
|
Pennsylvania State Profile - Winter 2003
Job growth rates in Pennsylvania's two biggest cities are diverging,
and the net effect is a state growth rate that is slightly negative.
The slow recovery in manufacturing, especially in the western part of
the state, is driving the state's net job losses.
- Pennsylvania's aggregate rate of job growth was slightly negative
through third quarter 2003, but that belies job growth in the Philadelphia, Harrisburg, Lancaster, and Altoona metropolitan
areas (MSAs). Offsetting the gains in those places are continuing losses
in Pittsburgh and elsewhere in the western
part of the state (see Chart 1). In fact,
four of the state's five weakest cities in terms of job growth are
in the western half of the state, including Johnstown, Erie, and Sharon, areas
that have a higher concentration of manufacturing jobs.
[D]
- Pennsylvania's manufacturing sector continues its slow recovery from
deep recession (see Chart 2). In third quarter
2003, the sector shed 34,000 jobs, primarily in the western cities.
The state's trade, transportation, and utilities sectors, industries
closely linked to manufacturing, shed another 28,000 jobs. Other sectors
are beginning to show strength, however, including the state's education
and health services, information, and government sectors.
[D]
- With the exception of the Philadelphia and Pittsburgh MSAs, which
straddle the national rate, rates of home price appreciation among
most of the state's other metropolitan areas have trailed the nation
since the beginning of the recession in first quarter 2001 (see Chart
3). As a result, the amount of equity available to homeowners
in those areas has not grown as rapidly as other parts of the nation
and may, in part, limit the role of the consumer in the state's economic
recovery.
[D]
- Like many other cities, Pittsburgh is suffering from a budget crisis.
The 2004 budget has a $42 million shortfall, and discussions are under
way in the state legislature about establishing a financial oversight
board. The city's municipal bonds were recently lowered to “junk” status
by both Standard and Poor's and Fitch. Expectations are that a new
taxing authority and possibly some assistance from the state legislature
will be approved, which should alleviate some budget pressure.
The net interest margin (NIM) reported by Pennsylvania's insured institutions
contracted in the first half 2003.
- NIMs among the state's insured institutions continued to contract
in the first half 2003 (see Chart 4). Historically
low long-term interest rates have motivated borrowers to refinance
debt in record numbers, while bank deposit costs have approached floors.
[D]
- Long-term interest rates increased during the second half 2003, which
contributed to steepening of the yield curve. While a steeper yield
curve is traditionally positive for bank NIMs, the benefits tend to
lag yield curve changes.
- The state's median ratio of long-term assets-to-average earning assets
traditionally is above the nation's (see Chart 5).
A large proportion of residential mortgage lenders (34 percent of the
state's insured institutions specialize in mortgage lending) and the
popularity of long-term mortgage products in metropolitan areas of
the Northeast contributed to the higher ratio.1 Insured
institutions with high concentrations of long-term assets could face
some margin compression, asset depreciation, and extension in asset
duration should interest rates rise, thereby heightening the importance
of proper interest rate risk management practices.
[D]
Credit quality among insured institutions headquartered in Pennsylvania
has remained favorable during this economic downturn.
- After slightly increasing, the past-due loan ratio among Pennsylvania's
insured institutions held steady in the first half 2003 compared with
the prior year. Loan delinquency rates remain lower than the nation's
across loan categories, except for CRE loans (see Chart
6).
[D]
- CRE concentration levels among the state's insured institutions have
moderately increased. Between the second quarter 1998 and 2003, the
percentage of the state's insured institutions with CRE loans to Tier
1 capital greater than 300 percent increased from 7.4 percent to 16
percent.
- CRE conditions worsened slightly in the state's two largest office
markets in third quarter 2003. The office vacancy rate in the Philadelphia
MSA jumped one percent to 16.9, equivalent to the national average.
Philadelphia was characterized by increasing completions as well as
negative net absorption. The vacancy rate in the Pittsburgh MSA increased
slightly to 18.3 percent. Nevertheless, the state's CRE loan delinquency
rate remains well below levels of a decade ago. Lower interest rates
have enabled CRE borrowers to refinance at advantageous interest rates;
however, financing costs may increase as rates rise. In addition, as
office leases booked during the height of the economic expansion expire,
new leases may be at lower rents.
1"Residential lenders" are defined as insured institutions
that hold at least 50 percent of assets in 1-4 family mortgage loans
and mortgage backed securities.
Pennsylvania at a Glance
| General Information |
Jun-03 |
Jun-02 |
Jun-01 |
Jun-00 |
Jun-99 |
| Institutions (#) |
276 |
288 |
298 |
310 |
310 |
| Total Assets (in thousands) |
297,425,519 |
274,395,831 |
258,358,177 |
274,295,338 |
261,685,265 |
| New Institutions (# < 3
years) |
10 |
14 |
19 |
16 |
13 |
| New Institutions (# < 9
years) |
28 |
30 |
27 |
26 |
22 |
| |
| Capital |
Jun-03 |
Jun-02 |
Jun-01 |
Jun-00 |
Jun-99 |
| Tier 1 Leverage (median) |
8.94 |
8.97 |
9.21 |
9.41 |
9.40 |
| |
| Asset Quality |
Jun-03 |
Jun-02 |
Jun-01 |
Jun-00 |
Jun-99 |
| Past-Due and Nonaccrual (median %) |
1.51% |
1.53% |
1.61% |
1.41% |
1.61% |
| Past-Due and Nonaccrual ≥ 5% |
25 |
21 |
21 |
21 |
20 |
| ALLL/Total Loans (median %) |
1.14% |
1.10% |
1.05% |
1.05% |
1.06% |
| ALLL/Noncurrent Loans (median multiple) |
1.43 |
1.38 |
1.43 |
1.75 |
1.71 |
| Net Loan Losses/Loans (aggregate) |
0.32% |
0.41% |
0.40% |
0.22% |
0.24% |
| |
| Earnings |
Jun-03 |
Jun-02 |
Jun-01 |
Jun-00 |
Jun-99 |
| Unprofitable Institutions (#) |
16 |
25 |
26 |
21 |
19 |
| Percent Unprofitable |
5.80% |
8.68% |
8.72% |
6.77% |
6.13% |
| Return on Assets (median %) |
0.93 |
0.97 |
0.85 |
0.91 |
0.98 |
| 25th Percentile |
0.64 |
0.59 |
0.56 |
0.63 |
0.70 |
| Net Interest Margin (median %) |
3.41% |
3.63% |
3.51% |
3.71% |
3.74% |
| Yield on Earning Assets (median) |
5.71% |
6.58% |
7.50% |
7.59% |
7.37% |
| Cost of Funding Earning Assets (median) |
2.32% |
2.97% |
4.03% |
3.92% |
3.64% |
| Provisions to Avg. Assets (median) |
0.08% |
0.10% |
0.08% |
0.09% |
0.09% |
| Noninterest Income to Avg. Assets (median) |
0.48% |
0.46% |
0.46% |
0.43% |
0.41% |
| Overhead to Avg. Assets (median) |
2.48% |
2.53% |
2.56% |
2.55% |
2.56% |
| |
| Liquidity/Sensitivity |
Jun-03 |
Jun-02 |
Jun-01 |
Jun-00 |
Jun-99 |
| Loans to Deposits (median %) |
75.07% |
78.41% |
80.47% |
83.45% |
77.32% |
| Loans to Assets (median %) |
58.22% |
62.62% |
63.27% |
65.60% |
64.09% |
| Brokered Deposits (# of institutions) |
41 |
34 |
28 |
31 |
21 |
| Bro. Deps./Assets (median for above inst.) |
1.22% |
2.09% |
1.64% |
2.57% |
1.13% |
| Noncore Funding to Assets (median) |
18.00% |
17.33% |
16.68% |
17.00% |
13.65% |
| Core Funding to Assets (median) |
70.35% |
70.74% |
70.70% |
71.31% |
73.98% |
| |
| Bank Class |
Jun-03 |
Jun-02 |
Jun-01 |
Jun-00 |
Jun-99 |
| State Nonmember |
63 |
67 |
64 |
66 |
64 |
| National |
80 |
80 |
87 |
94 |
97 |
| State Member |
29 |
29 |
31 |
32 |
33 |
| S&L |
31 |
34 |
35 |
36 |
38 |
| Savings Bank |
23 |
27 |
31 |
32 |
30 |
| Mutually Insured |
50 |
51 |
50 |
50 |
48 |
| |
| MSA Distribution |
# of Inst. |
Assets |
% Inst. |
% Assets |
|
| Philadelphia PA-NJ PMSA |
76 |
57,561,400 |
27.54% |
19.35% |
|
| No MSA |
65 |
30,021,856 |
23.55% |
10.09% |
|
| Pittsburgh PA |
44 |
121,282,176 |
15.94% |
40.78% |
|
| Harrisburg-Lebanon-Carlisle PA |
19 |
11,625,794 |
6.88% |
3.91% |
|
| Scranton—Wilkes-Barre—Hazelton
PA |
15 |
5,423,947 |
5.43% |
1.82% |
|
| Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton PA-NJ |
15 |
6,094,665 |
5.43% |
2.05% |
|
| Lancaster PA |
9 |
9,230,814 |
3.26% |
3.10% |
|
| Johnstown PA |
8 |
2,293,511 |
2.90% |
0.77% |
|
| Reading City PA |
6 |
45,407,257 |
2.17% |
15.27% |
|
| York PA |
4 |
1,115,459 |
1.45% |
0.38% |
|
| Williamsport PA |
4 |
1,107,752 |
1.45% |
0.37% |
|
| Altoona PA |
4 |
604,059 |
1.45% |
0.20% |
|
| Sharon PA |
3 |
4,809,125 |
1.09% |
1.62% |
|
| Erie PA |
3 |
627,915 |
1.09% |
0.21% |
|
| State College PA |
1 |
219,789 |
0.36% |
0.07% |
|
|