
|
New York State Profile - Winter 2003
New York State's employment conditions improved through the first nine
months of 2003. Conditions in the state's financial services and manufacturing
sectors will be key factors in the economic recovery.
- The rate of job losses in New York State eased through September
2003 and closely approximated national trends (see Chart
1).
[D]
- New York City's job market continued to
contract through September 2003. Although the rate of loss has eased,
the City's job losses equal about 85 percent of total jobs lost in
the state since the beginning of the recession (see Chart
2). Layoffs and reduced compensation in the securities industry
have had a negative ripple effect across the area. However, according
to the Securities Industries Association, Wall Street is poised for
a turnaround with forecasts of increased compensation and hiring in
2004.1
[D]
- Rochester's greater relative concentration
of jobs in the troubled manufacturing sector contributed to its weaker
employment performance since the start of the recession. In Syracuse, which
is somewhat less reliant on manufacturing jobs than Rochester, manufacturing
cuts were offset by gains in the retail, trade, professional, business,
education, and health services sectors.
- The Hudson Valley, including Rockland, Putnam, and Dutchess counties, has
recorded job gains. These areas have added business and professional
service jobs.
- The office vacancy rate in Midtown Manhattan was among the lowest
rates of the nation's largest office markets. Rents, however, have decreased by 26 percent from peak
levels(see Chart 3). The Downtown Manhattan office vacancy rate increased slightly
to 10.9 percent in third quarter 2003, though it remains below the
national average of 16.9 percent. Local government
tax incentives have been used to attract tenants downtown and some
office space is being converted for residential use, which could alleviate
downward pressure on commercial rents.
[D]
- Appreciation in home prices moderated across the state in third quarter
2003. Appreciation also slowed from double-digit gains in Nassau,
Suffolk, and Dutchess counties. Affordability has weakened
as income levels have failed to keep pace with rising property values
and slightly higher mortgage rates.
Credit quality among New York's insured institutions improved during
the first half 2003 compared with the prior year.
- The average delinquency ratio reported by the state's large insured
institutions, those with total assets over $10 billion, declined through
the second quarter 2003 (see Chart 4). After
peaking in the fourth quarter 2002, delinquency ratios have improved
across most loan categories. The large bank C&I delinquency ratio
has declined, but at 5.11 percent was almost double the rate in mid-2001.
[D]
- Conditions for large bank C&I loans may be improving. The September
2003 Shared National Credit Review, jointly released by the federal
banking agencies, indicated that credit quality of large syndicated
loans has stabilized. Moreover, the Federal Reserve's October 2003
Senior Loan Officer Survey suggested that demand for C&I loans
may be stabilizing as, for the second consecutive quarter, fewer large
banks reported weaker C&I demand.
- The state's insured institutions with assets less than $10 billion
also reported improved credit quality trends. Smaller institutions
generally did not experience material credit quality weakening during
this economic downturn, which was primarily centered within large bank
C&I lending portfolios.
The net interest margin (NIM) reported by New York's insured institutions
contracted through the first half 2003. Steepening in the yield curve
in the third quarter 2003 could aid bank margins on a lagged basis; however,
some institutions may have exposure to rising interest rates.
- NIMs among the state's insured institutions with less than $10 billion
in assets contracted during the first half 2003 (see Chart
5). These institutions tend to be more reliant on net interest
income than larger banks. A 45-year low in long-term interest rates
reached in June 2003 contributed to a decline in asset yields, while
deposit costs neared floors.
[D]
- During the third quarter 2003, the yield curve steepened as long-
and intermediate-term interest rates increased. While a steeper yield
curve is traditionally positive for bank NIMs, the benefits tend to
lag yield curve changes.
- New York's median ratio of long-term assets-to-average earning assets
remains above the nation's (see Chart 6).
A significant number of residential mortgage lenders and the popularity
of long-term mortgage products in metropolitan areas of the Northeast
contributed to the higher ratio. Insured institutions with high concentrations
of long-term assets may face margin compression, asset depreciation,
and extension in asset duration should long-term interest rates rise,
thereby heightening the importance of proper interest rate risk management
practices.
[D]
1 Frank Fernandez. Economic and Securities Industry Outlook.
SIA Research Reports. Volume 1v, No. 9. October 6, 2003.
New York at a Glance
| General Information |
Jun-03 |
Jun-02 |
Jun-01 |
Jun-00 |
Jun-99 |
| Institutions (#) |
209 |
213 |
224 |
234 |
241 |
| Total Assets (in thousands) |
1,739,565,436 |
1,554,525,525 |
1,511,210,163 |
1,328,668,765 |
1,252,737,310 |
| New Institutions (# < 3
years) |
9 |
11 |
15 |
14 |
9 |
| New Institutions (# < 9
years) |
26 |
24 |
22 |
19 |
18 |
| |
| Capital |
Jun-03 |
Jun-02 |
Jun-01 |
Jun-00 |
Jun-99 |
| Tier 1 Leverage (median) |
8.60 |
8.73 |
8.79 |
9.17 |
9.31 |
| |
| Asset Quality |
Jun-03 |
Jun-02 |
Jun-01 |
Jun-00 |
Jun-99 |
| Past-Due and Nonaccrual (median %) |
1.43% |
1.58% |
1.67% |
1.56% |
1.72% |
| Past-Due and Nonaccrual ≥ 5% |
21 |
21 |
16 |
16 |
24 |
| ALLL/Total Loans (median %) |
1.15% |
1.13% |
1.06% |
1.05% |
1.15% |
| ALLL/Noncurrent Loans (median multiple) |
1.64 |
1.67 |
1.68 |
1.79 |
1.39 |
| Net Loan Losses/Loans (aggregate) |
1.10% |
1.19% |
0.50% |
0.39% |
0.47% |
| |
| Earnings |
Jun-03 |
Jun-02 |
Jun-01 |
Jun-00 |
Jun-99 |
| Unprofitable Institutions (#) |
7 |
16 |
19 |
16 |
16 |
| Percent Unprofitable |
3.35% |
7.51% |
8.48% |
6.84% |
6.64% |
| Return on Assets (median %) |
0.92 |
0.95 |
0.87 |
0.93 |
0.96 |
| 25th Percentile |
0.57 |
0.59 |
0.52 |
0.63 |
0.59 |
| Net Interest Margin (median %) |
3.80% |
4.05% |
3.92% |
4.16% |
4.02% |
| Yield on Earning Assets (median) |
5.61% |
6.54% |
7.59% |
7.70% |
7.36% |
| Cost of Funding Earning Assets (median) |
1.72% |
2.28% |
3.75% |
3.63% |
3.31% |
| Provisions to Avg. Assets (median) |
0.10% |
0.11% |
0.10% |
0.09% |
0.09% |
| Noninterest Income to Avg. Assets (median) |
0.66% |
0.63% |
0.61% |
0.58% |
0.55% |
| Overhead to Avg. Assets (median) |
2.86% |
2.87% |
2.86% |
2.89% |
2.94% |
| |
| Liquidity/Sensitivity |
Jun-03 |
Jun-02 |
Jun-01 |
Jun-00 |
Jun-99 |
| Loans to Deposits (median %) |
65.77% |
70.77% |
73.96% |
73.91% |
70.31% |
| Loans to Assets (median %) |
54.72% |
58.42% |
59.90% |
60.79% |
58.23% |
| Brokered Deposits (# of institutions) |
54 |
52 |
56 |
52 |
48 |
| Bro. Deps./Assets (median for above inst.) |
2.81% |
2.58% |
1.39% |
1.86% |
2.57% |
| Noncore Funding to Assets (median) |
16.60% |
17.36% |
20.23% |
18.65% |
16.02% |
| Core Funding to Assets (median) |
70.01% |
69.81% |
67.35% |
68.71% |
69.93% |
| |
| Bank Class |
Jun-03 |
Jun-02 |
Jun-01 |
Jun-00 |
Jun-99 |
| State Nonmember |
56 |
58 |
60 |
59 |
62 |
| National |
57 |
57 |
60 |
63 |
64 |
| State Member |
23 |
22 |
25 |
27 |
27 |
| S&L |
21 |
22 |
23 |
25 |
28 |
| Savings Bank |
23 |
22 |
22 |
25 |
24 |
| Mutually Insured |
29 |
32 |
34 |
35 |
36 |
| |
| MSA Distribution |
# of Inst. |
Assets |
% Inst. |
% Assets |
|
| New York NY PMSA |
87 |
1,479,836,930 |
41.63% |
85.07% |
|
| No MSA |
45 |
18,770,197 |
21.53% |
1.08% |
|
| Syracuse NY |
12 |
3,244,894 |
5.74% |
0.19% |
|
| Nassau-Suffolk NY PMSA |
11 |
50,367,836 |
5.26% |
2.90% |
|
| Albany-Schenectady-Troy NY |
11 |
6,021,460 |
5.26% |
0.35% |
|
| Rochester NY |
10 |
26,249,822 |
4.78% |
1.51% |
|
| Newburgh NY-PA PMSA |
8 |
1,689,715 |
3.83% |
0.10% |
|
| Buffalo-Niagara Falls NY |
8 |
144,710,388 |
3.83% |
8.32% |
|
| Utica-Rome NY |
5 |
2,647,589 |
2.39% |
0.15% |
|
| Dutchess County NY PMSA |
4 |
617,565 |
1.91% |
0.04% |
|
| Elmira NY |
3 |
1,261,607 |
1.44% |
0.07% |
|
| Jamestown NY |
2 |
599,402 |
0.96% |
0.03% |
|
| Binghamton NY |
2 |
2,393,429 |
0.96% |
0.14% |
|
| Glens Falls NY |
1 |
1,154,602 |
0.48% |
0.07% |
|
|