Skip Site Summary Navigation
FDIC Home - Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation: Insuring America's Future
QUICK LINKS FOR
SEARCH THE SITE

Deposit InsuranceConsumer ProtectionIndustry AnalysisRegulation and ExaminationsAsset SalesNews and EventsAbout FDIC
Home > Industry Analysis > Research & Analysis > FDIC State Profiles

FDIC State Profiles

Texas State Profile - Winter 2004

Texas job growth is forecast to exceed the nation.
  • After three years of lagging the U.S. economy, Texas is primed to grow slightly faster than the nation in 2005 (See Chart 1).

    [D]Chart 1: A Recovering Texas Economy is Forecast to Grow Slightly Faster Than The U.S. in 2005

  • The expansion of the professional and business sector and the leisure and hospitality services sector is aiding the state’s improving economy, along with solid growth in health and educational services. Additionally, the construction and transportation sectors are reporting accelerating year-over-year job growth, while the economic drag from the ailing manufacturing and information sectors is diminishing.
  • Continued U.S. economic growth and global trade, coupled with favorable population trends and relatively low business and living costs, will contribute to the state’s economic growth in 2005.
 
Natural resource and mining employment growth slowed despite record oil prices.
  • Texas natural resources and mining employment growth decelerated in third quarter 2004 despite oil prices that were 45 percent higher than the year before.
  • This employment decline can be attributed, in part, to the ongoing shift in oil exploration and development away from Texas to other parts of the world.
  • According to the National Association of Business Economics outlook, strong economic fundamentals are expected to support oil prices above $40 per barrel through 2005, resulting in continued job growth for this sector.
  • Although higher energy prices impose additional costs to consumers and industrial users, prices will provide a slightly positive benefit to the state. 1
 
Easy come, easy go as fortunes for state metropolitan areas change.
  • In a reversal of fortunes, the metropolitan areas of Dallas, Ft. Worth, and Austin continue to exhibit job growth rates that are lagging the statewide average (See Chart 2).

    [D]Chart 2: Dallas,Ft. Worth & Austin - Leaders in the 90s, Lagged the State Job Growth Average

  • Extended weaknesses in the airlines, telecommunications, and semiconductor and personal computer industries have restrained growth in these areas. Meanwhile, foreign trade, oil prices, tourism, and defense spending have bolstered the economies of El Paso, Houston and San Antonio.
  • As the U.S. expansion strengthens in 2005, economic and employment growth in the state’s largest metropolitan areas likely will continue to accelerate.
 
Despite weak employment growth, population growth in the largest cities has surpassed the state.
  • Population growth rates in the metropolitan areas of Dallas/Fort Worth, Austin, Houston, and San Antonio have exceeded the state since 2001.
  • Many of these new residents were enticed to relocate by the expanding leisure and hospitality industry, which has finally seen a revival since 9/11.
  • Additionally, many professionals are moving to take advantage of the educational and health care opportunities as well as professional business services that larger cities provide.
  • This influx of new residents provides the metro areas with an abundant labor supply and increased prospects for local lenders.
 
Texas markets remain on the front burner of bank deposit and branch growth because of strong population growth.
  • Texas is home to three of the nation's ten largest cities. The state’s population expanded almost 23 percent between 1990 and 2000, making Texas the second most populous state behind California.
  • Population growth tends to propel economic activity and stimulate the need for banking offices and services. Indeed, the state’s attractive demographics and banks’ interest in capturing market share have ranked Texas second in the country for fastest branch growth during the past five years, fifth highest in terms of deposit growth.2
  • While small banks (less than $1 billion in assets) have maintained a steady share of deposits, large banks (both in state and out-of-state) have experienced the lion’s share of deposit and office growth (See Chart 3).

    [D]Chart 3: Deposit Growth Remains Primarily In Metro Areas, Coinciding With Population Gains

  • Metropolitan areas held an increasing level of branches (80 percent) and deposits (89 percent) in 2004, up from 76 percent and 84 percent, respectively, in 1994.
  • Looking forward, John Heasley, Texas Bankers Association executive vice president, said this trend is not expected to subside anytime soon, particularly in the urban centers and along the Interstate 35 corridor.3
 
Large financial institutions continue to outperform smaller ones.
  • The performance gap is growing between larger banks (over $250 million in assets) and smaller banks, which represent 84 percent of Texas insured institutions (See Chart 4).

    [D]Chart 4: While Small Banks' Profitability Has Improved, Larger Banks Still Outperform

  • A modest improvement in net interest margins (NIMs) during the third quarter has been especially positive for smaller, more NIM-dependent banks. However, larger banks continue to exhibit a comparative advantage in operating efficiencies and an ability to generate sources of other non-interest income.
  • Asset quality remains strong for insured institutions, with past-due and charge-off rates among the lowest levels in a decade. Texas median past-due ratios ranked 14th nationwide for third quarter 2004.
 
Consumer fundamentals show signs of improvement.
  • Both bankruptcy and foreclosure rates decreased in second quarter 2004. The statewide foreclosure rate especially improved, falling to its lowest level in almost two years.
  • In 2003, Texans voted for a constitutional amendment that would allow homeowners to avail themselves of home equity lines of credit (HELOC). Additionally, more consumers are turning to HELOCs as a source of cash in response to the recent cooling in mortgage refinancings. These two factors have combined to fuel a 92 percent year-over-year growth rate in Texas HELOCs as of September 2004, twice that of the nation.
 
 

1 November 2004 Economy.com Regional Teleconference.

2 Based on a compounded growth rate for offices other than main office locations.

3 Pack, William, “Merger Commotion Reshapes Banking Landscape in Texas,” San Antonio Press, November 11, 2004.

 

Texas at a Glance

General Information 09-04 09-03 09-02 09-01 09-00
Institutions (#) 686 706 718 741 774
Total Assets (in thousands) 211,094,952 221,062,644 211,887,711 192,422,748 225,750,004
New Institutions (# < 3 years) 21 22 18 21 30
New Institutions (# < 9 years) 57 55 54 52 48
           
Capital 09-04 09-03 09-02 09-01 09-00
Tier 1 Leverage (median) 9.58 9.12 9.16 9.03 9.29
           
Asset Quality 09-04 09-03 09-02 09-01 09-00
Past-Due and Nonaccrual (median %) 1.70% 2.07% 2.16% 2.07% 1.81%
Past-Due and Nonaccrual >= 5% 68 95 103 102 83
ALLL/Total Loans (median %) 1.24% 1.28% 1.24% 1.19% 1.20%
ALLL/Noncurrent Loans (median multiple) 2.11 1.77 1.54 1.75 2.11
Net Loan Losses/Loans (aggregate) 0.29% 0.39% 0.39% 0.38% 0.31%
           
Earnings (Year-to-Date Annualized) 09-04 09-03 09-02 09-01 09-00
Unprofitable Institutions (#) 46 41 45 46 36
Percent Unprofitable 6.71% 5.81% 6.27% 6.21% 4.65%
Return on Assets (median %) 1.09 1.05 1.18 1.13 1.29
25th Percentile 0.73 0.68 0.74 0.77 0.93
Net Interest Margin (median %) 4.22% 4.23% 4.52% 4.46% 4.79%
Yield on Earning Assets (median) 5.41% 5.65% 6.43% 7.81% 8.23%
Cost of Funding Earning Assets (median) 1.08% 1.40% 1.96% 3.37% 3.43%
Provisions to Avg. Assets (median) 0.11% 0.14% 0.18% 0.14% 0.14%
Noninterest Income to Avg. Assets (median) 0.92% 0.93% 0.88% 0.87% 0.89%
Overhead to Avg. Assets (median) 3.38% 3.34% 3.36% 3.37% 3.42%
           
Liquidity/Sensitivity 09-04 09-03 09-02 09-01 09-00
Loans to Deposits (median %) 66.32% 63.52% 63.61% 62.96% 62.12%
Loans to Assets (median %) 56.87% 54.84% 54.90% 54.93% 54.32%
Brokered Deposits (# of Institutions) 77 72 59 51 42
Bro. Deps./Assets (median for above inst.) 3.68% 2.92% 3.85% 1.96% 2.51%
Noncore Funding to Assets (median) 16.50% 16.21% 16.47% 16.58% 15.90%
Core Funding to Assets (median) 71.54% 72.62% 72.03% 71.82% 73.02%
           
Bank Class 09-04 09-03 09-02 09-01 09-00
State Nonmember 290 294 297 303 319
National 314 324 333 346 361
State Member 40 42 42 43 44
S&L 9 11 11 12 10
Savings Bank 11 12 12 13 15
Stock and Mutual SB 22 23 23 24 25
           
MSA Distribution # of Inst. Assets % Inst. % Assets      
No MSA 363 36,189,390 52.92% 17.14%  
Dallas TX PMSA 72 23,550,310 10.50% 11.16%  
Houston TX PMSA 47 37,109,888 6.85% 17.58%  
Ft Worth-Arlington TX PMSA 39 8,503,212 5.69% 4.03%  
Austin-San Marcos TX 19 18,462,226 2.77% 8.75%  
San Antonio TX 16 28,690,813 2.33% 13.59%  
Longview-Marshall TX 12 1,616,858 1.75% 0.77%  
Waco TX 11 1,726,159 1.60% 0.82%  
Lubbock TX 11 7,692,081 1.60% 3.64%  
Killeen-Temple TX 10 2,728,844 1.46% 1.29%  
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission TX 10 10,902,436 1.46% 5.16%  
Corpus Christi TX 8 1,983,991 1.17% 0.94%  
Odessa-Midland TX 7 1,721,754 1.02% 0.82%  
Brazoria TX PMSA 6 671,840 0.87% 0.32%  
All Other MSAs 55 29,545,150 8.02% 14.00%  
           
 
Last Updated 12/20/2004 Questions, Suggestions & Requests

Home    Contact Us    Search    Help    SiteMap    Forms
Freedom of Information Act    Website Policies    FirstGov.gov