 |
FYI: An Update on Emerging Issues in Banking
Subscribe Unsubscribe
Highlights from the 2006 Summary of Deposits Data
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) survey
all FDIC-insured institutions annually as of June 30 to gather information on deposits and offices in
operation. The resulting Summary of Deposits (SOD) is a valuable resource for conducting analyses of
local and national deposit market trends and measuring market concentrations. This issue of FYI graphically highlights preliminary conclusions from the 2006 SOD data.1
Nationwide, deposit and office growth remains strong.
Commercial banks and thrifts continue to consolidate into larger, more diverse entities. Although
the number of institution charters has declined during recent years, banking organizations continue
to expand deposits and branching networks. The number of FDIC-insured institution offices increased
2.9 percent during the year ending June 30, 2006 (see Chart 1).2 However, the rate of increase in
deposits (8.9 percent) considerably exceeded the growth in the number of offices. During the past
five years, as the number of offices has expanded at a 1.9 percent compounded rate, deposits grew at
a compounded rate of 8.3 percent.
d
The most robust office and
deposit growth has occurred in areas with the greatest population density.
As has been the case in past years, the volume of deposits and
number of offices continue to expand most rapidly in the nation’s larger metropolitan
areas, eclipsing growth in smaller micropolitan and non-metro areas (see Table
1).3
| Most
Rapid Rates of Office Growth Have Occurred in the Nation's Larger Population
Centers |
| |
Other Areas |
Micropolitan Areas |
Metropolitan Areas |
|
Number of Offices |
Domestic Deposits
($ billions) |
Number of Offices |
Domestic Deposits
($ billions) |
Number of Offices |
Domestic Deposits
($ billions) |
June 2001 |
9,735 |
238 |
11,561 |
372 |
64,144 |
3,679 |
June 2005 |
9,804 |
267 |
11,890 |
431 |
69,713 |
5,177 |
June 2006 |
9,853 |
281 |
12,051 |
443 |
72,187 |
5,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year Growth Rate |
0.5% |
5.2% |
1.4% |
2.7% |
3.5% |
9.4% |
5 Year Compound Growth Rate |
0.2% |
3.3% |
0.8% |
3.5% |
2.4% |
9.0% |
Source: FDIC/OTS Summary of
Deposits Survey
Note: Metropolitan statistical areas have urban clusters of greater than 50,000 inhabitants. Each
micropolitan statistical area has an urban cluster of between 10,000 and 50,000 inhabitants. Other
areas have less population.
See U.S. Census Bureau definitions for greater detail.
|
States experiencing the most rapid rates of growth in number of branches are not necessarily those where
the volume of deposits also is expanding rapidly. Generally, with few exceptions, deposit growth is
strongest in coastal areas, whereas office growth varies more widely across the country (see Map 1 and
Map 2). In many cases, demographic factors, such as population, employment, and per capita income growth,
correlate well with the growth in deposits and number of offices. However, state law and specific local
market conditions also drive branching decisions.
d
d
The nation’s largest
banking organizations report the most rapid rate of growth in banking offices.
Consolidated banking organizations holding more than $10 billion in deposits have reported the most rapid
growth in the number of offices during the past five years (see Table 2). In contrast, banking organizations
holding deposits under $1 billion have reported a small decline during this period. Mid-size companies ($1
billion to $10 billion in deposits) reported a moderate increase in both the number of offices and volume of
deposits. The stronger growth rate of larger companies also reflects longer-term consolidation trends.
| The
Largest Companies Have Reported the Greatest Deposit Growth |
| |
Small Organizations |
Mid-Size Organizations |
Large Organizations |
|
Number of Offices |
Domestic Deposits
($ billions) |
Number of Offices |
Domestic Deposits
($ billions) |
Number of Offices |
Domestic Deposits
($ billions) |
June 2001 |
32,377 |
999 |
16,784 |
804 |
36,279 |
3,679 |
June 2005 |
31,623 |
1,107 |
17,503 |
967 |
42,281 |
5,177 |
June 2006 |
31,644 |
1,135 |
18,135 |
1,040 |
44,312 |
5,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year Growth Rate |
0.1% |
2.5% |
3.6% |
7.5% |
4.8% |
10.8% |
5 Year Compound Growth Rate |
-0.5% |
2.6% |
1.6% |
2.6% |
4.1% |
2.6% |
Source: FDIC/OTS Summary of
Deposits Survey. Excludes institutions in U.S. territories.
Note:
Small = organizations with consolidated deposits less than $1 billion
Medium = organizations with consolidated deposits of $1 billion to $10 billion
Large= organizations with consolidated deposits greater then $10 billion
The number of charters included in "small organizations" has dropped from
8,726 in 2001 to 7,735 in 2006; the number of "mid-size" charters declined
from 721 to 744, and "large" charters dropped from 292 to 271.
|
The drive-up
facility is fading in popularity as offices in retail establishments are
becoming more common.
Increased use of locations in retail space, such as supermarkets and department stores, continues to be a
key trend in the expansion of banking offices. Although the pace of growth slowed during the past year, more
banking offices were established in retail space than in any other office type during the past five years
(see Table 3). At the same time, use of limited service drive-up facilities has declined steadily. The
number of standard brick and mortar banking offices continues to grow and remains the most common type of
office location.
| The
Number of Retail Banking Offices Has Risen Sharply During the Past
Five Years |
| |
Brick and Mortar Offices |
Retail
Offices |
Drive-Through Facilities |
Other Office Types |
Total |
| June 2001 |
64,033 |
3,510 |
3,172 |
832 |
71,547 |
| June 2005 |
68,897 |
4,583 |
2,957 |
960 |
77,397 |
| June 2006 |
71,267 |
4,636 |
2,917 |
1,009 |
79,829 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 Year Growth Rate |
3.4% |
1.2% |
-1.4% |
5.1% |
3.1% |
| 5 Year Compounded Growth Rate |
2.2% |
5.7% |
-1.7% |
3.9% |
2.2% |
Source: FDIC/OTS Summary
of Deposits Survey
Note: Commercial banks only. Retail banking offices are full service offices located in a retail facility such as a supermarket or department store.
|
Branch networks have
expanded more rapidly than the population has increased.
Nationwide, the number of FDIC-insured institution offices has expanded more
rapidly than the population has increased since 2000 (see Chart 2). However,
these offices continue to attract domestic deposits. Annual
growth in total domestic deposits averaged 8.3 percent between 2001 and 2005,
compared with 5.4 percent between 1996 and 2000. These trends may imply a more
aggressive retailing strategy as banks seek to provide
a greater level of service to customers.
d
The pace of industry consolidation continues to slow.
The number of FDIC-insured commercial banks and savings institutions dropped 1 percent during the year ending
June 30, 2006 (currently a total of 8,778 institutions), the slowest decline since the mid 1980s. Merger and
acquisition activity is affected by general economic conditions, trends in equity markets, and national and
state laws, such as the nationwide concentration limits mandated by the Riegle-Neal Act. No banking
organizations, even the largest, most geographically diverse, have a presence in all 50 states (see Table 4).
| A Fifty State Banking Company Does Not Yet Exist |
| Name of
Company |
Number of States with Deposit Offices |
Reported Number of Deposit Offices |
Domestic Deposits ($ billions) |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION |
31 |
5,789 |
590.6 |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. |
26 |
2,721 |
462.3 |
| U.S. BANCORP |
26 |
2,526 |
117.4 |
| WELLS FARGO & COMPANY |
23 |
3,216 |
309.0 |
| WACHOVIA CORPORATION * |
22 |
3,447 |
370.0 |
| BNP PARIBAS |
20 |
724 |
41.3 |
| NORTHERN TRUST CORPORATION |
17 |
91 |
13.4 |
| DICKINSON FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
17 |
169 |
3.1 |
| FIRST HORIZON NATIONAL CORPORATION |
16 |
240 |
21.7 |
| WASHINGTON MUTUAL GROUP |
15 |
2,195 |
210.7 |
| REGIONS FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
15 |
1,397 |
57.2 |
Fifteen
of the top twenty-five markets are “moderately concentrated.”
Market concentration is an
important competitive factor considered by bank regulatory agencies and the
Department of Justice (DOJ) in the analysis
of proposed mergers and acquisitions. Although the number
of banking offices continues to grow in many large metropolitan areas, none
of the top 25 metropolitan areas (ranked by population) meets the DOJ’s definition
of “highly concentrated,” implying
an active and competitive environment in the largest metropolitan areas (see
Table 5).4
None of the Largest Cities Is Characterized as a "Highly Concentrated" Market
(Top 25 metropolitan areas by population as of June 30, 2006) |
| Metropolitan Area |
Herfindahl-Hirschman Index(1) |
Population Estimate (2) (millions) |
5 Year Compounded Growth Rate in Offices |
5 Year Compounded Growth Rate in Deposits |
| Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX |
1,648 |
5.8 |
7.7 |
19.7 |
| Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN |
1,640 |
2.1 |
1.7 |
0.6 |
| Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI |
1,568 |
3.1 |
3.4 |
4.8 |
| Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH |
1,551 |
2.1 |
1.0 |
4.6 |
| Pittsburgh, PA |
1,533 |
2.4 |
0.3 |
6.3 |
| Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ |
1,516 |
3.9 |
6.9 |
10.4 |
| Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA |
1,432 |
4.9 |
4.9 |
13.2 |
| Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI |
1,427 |
4.5 |
2.6 |
5.3 |
| San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA |
1,357 |
4.2 |
0.5 |
8.5 |
| Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA |
1,331 |
2.1 |
2.0 |
8.7 |
| Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA |
1,330 |
3.2 |
1.4 |
9.3 |
| Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX |
1,160 |
5.3 |
6.0 |
6.3 |
| Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL |
1,139 |
2.6 |
2.4 |
6.7 |
| New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA |
1,112 |
18.7 |
2.8 |
10.7 |
| Baltimore-Towson, MD |
1,030 |
2.7 |
1.1 |
6.6 |
| San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA |
981 |
2.9 |
2.7 |
9.2 |
| Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH |
948 |
4.4 |
1.2 |
5.5 |
| Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA |
916 |
3.9 |
4.1 |
10.9 |
| Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD |
860 |
5.8 |
1.3 |
14.1 |
| Denver-Aurora, CO |
852 |
2.4 |
4.8 |
8.3 |
| Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Miami Beach, FL |
833 |
5.4 |
2.1 |
9.8 |
| Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV |
833 |
5.2 |
2.1 |
12.9 |
| Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA |
746 |
12.9 |
2.2 |
8.3 |
| St. Louis, MO-IL |
649 |
2.8 |
1.4 |
5.0 |
| Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI |
612 |
9.4 |
5.6 |
5.6 |
Source: FDIC/OTS Summary of
Deposits Survey, Moody's Economy.com
Note: (1) The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI), a commonly accepted measure of market concentration, is
calculated by squaring the market share of each firm competing in the market and then summing the resulting
numbers. Markets in which the HHI is between 1000 and 1800 points are considered to be "moderately
concentrated," and those in which the HHI is in excess of 1800 points are considered to be "highly
concentrated." For more information, please refer to the joint U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade
Commission website at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/testimony/hhi.htm (2) 2005 population estimates from
Moody's Economy.com.
|
About
the Summary of Deposits Data.
The FDIC’s SOD Web site at http://www2.fdic.gov/sod/index.asp has raw SOD data
available as well as various summary charts and tables. Additionally, the user
can find tools to help identify and analyze information on deposits and
branching activities of FDIC-insured institutions in specific markets.
Endnotes
1
This FYI reflects updates in the Summary of Deposits data as of
October 16, 2006. All FDIC-insured institutions that operate branch offices
beyond their home office and that are
required to file a financial report with one of the Federal Financial
Institutions Examination Council agencies must submit responses to SOD surveys
to the FDIC or the OTS. ATMs are
not considered offices for the purposes of the survey. Call Report
information on unit banks (banks with a single headquarters office) have
been combined with branch office data to form the
SOD database which can be accessed at www.fdic.gov.
2Offices here
include those in the 50 states and the District of Columbia, but not those in U.S. territories. The
SOD data include domestic deposits only, and they are referred to in this report as deposits.
3 Metropolitan
statistical areas are characterized by urban clusters of greater than 50,000 inhabitants. Each
micropolitan statistical area has an urban cluster of between 10,000 and 50,000 inhabitants. Other
areas have less population.
4Under the DOJ
guidelines, markets with a Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) of less than 1000 are considered
“unconcentrated;” those with an HHI between 1000 and 1800 are considered “moderately concentrated;”
and those with an HHI greater than 1800 are considered “highly concentrated.” For more details,
access the joint Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and DOJ Web site on “Horizontal Merger Guidelines”
at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/guidelines/horiz_book/hmg1.html.
About
the Author
Ronald Spieker is Chief of the Regional Programs Section, Division of Insurance and Research, FDIC.
Comments
and Inquiries
Send
comments or questions on the FYI to Ronald Spieker rspieker@fdic.gov
Send feedback and technical questions about the FYI series to:
fyi@fdic.gov
All media inquiries should be addressed to: David Barr, FDIC Office of Public
Affairs, dbarr@fdic.gov
About
FYI
FYI
is an electronic bulletin summarizing current information about the trends
that are driving change in the banking industry, plus links to the wide
array of other FDIC publications and data tools.
Disclaimer
The views
expressed in FYI are those of the authors and do not necessarily
reflect official positions of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Some of the information used in the preparation of this publication was
obtained from publicly available sources that are considered reliable. However,
the use of this information does not constitute an endorsement of its accuracy
by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
FYI
Home Subscribe Unsubscribe
|