| Table 2. Change in Economic Activity from Previous Year |
| 1980 | 1981 | 1982 | 1983 | 1984 | 1985 | 1986 | 1987 | 1988 | 1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil Patch cities* | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Employment | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.1 | 7.0 | 3.7 | -1.3 | 3.9 | 1.7 bust |
-3.1 bust |
1.2 bust |
2.5 bust |
2.5 bust |
3.7 bust |
2.5 bust |
0.8 bust |
2.9 | 3.3 | 3.6 | 3.0 | 4.1 | 4.4 | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Population | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 4.0 | 3.8 | 5.7 | 3.5 | 1.2 | 1.1 bust |
1.3 bust |
-1.1 bust |
-0.2 bust |
1.1 bust |
2.0 bust |
2.5 bust |
2.6 bust |
2.2 | 2.1 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.1 |
| California cities* | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Employment | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1.5 | 1.2 | -1.5 | 2.1 | 4.8 | 3.8 | 3.3 | 4.1 | 4.4 boom |
2.5 boom |
2.0 boom |
-1.7 | -2.9 | -0.8 | 0.5 bust |
2.4 bust |
1.8 bust |
1.1 bust |
3.9 bust |
2.5 boom |
2.7 boom |
| Population | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2.1 | 1.8 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 2.5 boom |
2.7 boom |
2.2 boom |
1.5 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.4 bust |
0.5 bust |
0.7 bust |
1.1 bust |
1.4 bust |
1.6 boom |
1.2 boom |
| New England cities* | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Employment | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2.0 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 5.6 | 3.8 boom |
3.7 boom |
2.9 boom |
2.9 boom |
-0.5 boom |
-1.7 | -4.2 bust |
-0.8 bust |
0.9 bust |
-0.3 bust |
1.8 bust |
1.7 bust |
1.6 bust |
1.6 bust |
1.7 | 2.1 boom |
| Population | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.8 boom |
0.8 boom |
0.8 boom |
0.8 boom |
0.3 boom |
0.3 | 0.3 bust |
0.0 bust |
0.3 bust |
0.3 bust |
0.3 bust |
0.5 bust |
0.5 bust |
0.6 bust |
0.7 | 0.8 boom |
| Peoria | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Employment | ||||||||||||||||||||
| -1.1 | -1.6 | -6.9 | -5.3 | 3.8 bust |
-0.7 bust |
0.5 bust |
1.5 bust |
4.3 bust |
3.2 | 2.1 | 0.1 | -0.5 | 1.9 | 2.8 | 1.4 | 3.9 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Population | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0.9 | -0.2 | -0.9 | -1.4 | -1.7 bust |
-2.0 bust |
-1.8 bust |
-0.8 bust |
0.0 bust |
0.8 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | -0.2 |
| Honolulu | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Employment | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 3.1 boom |
-1.2 | -0.7 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 4.7 | 3.2 | 3.1 boom |
3.2 boom |
2.0 boom |
0.2 | -0.6 | -1.0 | -0.9 | -0.5 bust |
-0.4 bust |
-0.2 bust |
-0.9 bust |
2.4 bust |
| Population | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0.7 boom |
1.1 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.9 boom |
0.9 boom |
1.4 boom |
1.6 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.2 bust |
0.4 bust |
0.0 bust |
-0.9 bust |
-0.4 bust |
| U.S. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Employment | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0.4 | 0.9 | -1.5 | 0.8 | 4.7 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 2.4 | 1.2 | -1.3 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 2.1 |
| Population | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| * Changes in employment and population are shown as weighted average for "bust" cities in these regions. Note: The boom and bust designation in this table corresponds to the boom and bust years shown in Table 1. Source: FDIC FYI "U.S. Home Prices: Does Bust Always Follow Boom?" February 10, 2005. (Bureau of Economic Analysis; Economy.com; U.S. Census Bureau). | ||||||||||||||||||||