FDIC Home - Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
FDIC - 75 years
FDIC Home - Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

 
Skip Site Summary Navigation   Home     Deposit Insurance     Consumer Protection     Industry Analysis     Regulations & Examinations     Asset Sales     News & Events     About FDIC  


Home > Industry Analysis > Research & Analysis > FDIC Banking Review




FDIC Banking Review

Table 3
Performane of Stress Test in Southern California
Worst Exam Rating REST Rating
1.0–2.5 2.5–3.5 3.5–4.5 4.5–5.0 Total
A. Number of Banks
1 or 2 12 12 18 4 46
3 12 17 19 5 53
4 or 5 4 14 17 21 56
Failed 1 2 8 4 15
Total 29 45 62 34 170
B. Percentage by Worst Rating
1 or 2 26.09 26.09 39.13 8.7  
3 22.64 32.08 35.85 9.43  
4 or 5 7.14 25 30.36 37.5  
Failed 6.67 13.33 53.33 26.67  
Total 17.06 26.47 36.47 20  
C. Percentage by REST Rating
1 or 2 41.38 26.67 29.03 11.76 27.06
3 41.38 37.78 30.65 14.71 31.18
4 or 5 13.79 31.11 27.42 61.76 32.94
Failed 3.45 4.44 12.9 11.76 8.82
Note: All banks were California banks supervised from the FDIC’s Los Angeles East, Los Angeles West, and Orange County field offices All banks had a 1 or 2 CAMELS composite rating as of December 1988 REST ratings are based on December 1988 Call Reports The worst rating was the worst CAMELS composite rating assigned between 1992 and 1995, and all failures occurred between 1992 and 1995.

Last Updated 12/16/2003 Questions, Suggestions & Requests

Home    Contact Us    Search    Help    SiteMap    Forms
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Service Center    Website Policies    USA.gov
FDIC Office of Inspector General