|
|
|
|
|
Home > Industry Analysis > Research & Analysis > FDIC Banking Review |
|
|
|
|||
|
FDIC Banking Review |
|
| Table 5 Option for Pricing Well-Capitalized and Highly-Rated Institutions Using CAMELS and SCOR Ratings (Year-End 2002) |
|||
| Subcategories | |||
| 1A1 | 1A2 | 1A3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Composite 1 Rated and Composit 2 Rated with SCOR Rating < 125 |
3,618 41.7% |
||
| Composite 2 Rated with SCOR Rating >= 125 and <= 175 |
2,767 31.9% |
||
| Composite 2 Rated with SCOR Rating > 175 |
2,285 26.4% |
||
| Note: SCOR values are calculated from December 31, 2002, Call Report data, and these values are combined with December 2002 exam ratings. The 1A1 subgroup represents the least risk and the 1A3 subgroup represents the greatest risk. The figures in the cells refer to the number and percentage of 1A institutions. | |||
| Last Updated 12/16/2003 | Questions, Suggestions & Requests |