 |
 |
 |
Home |  |
Deposit Insurance | |
Consumer Protection | |
Industry Analysis | |
Regulations & Examinations | |
Asset Sales | |
News & Events | |
About FDIC | |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home > Industry Analysis > Research & Analysis > FDIC Banking Review |
|
|
|
|||
|
FDIC Banking Review |
|
| Table 2 Options for Pricing Well-Capitalized and Highly-Rated Institutions Using CAMELS Ratings (Year-End 2002) |
|||
| Subcategories | |||
| 1A1 | 1A2 | 1A3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Option 1: Using Composite Ratings | |||
| Composite 1 Rated | 3,501 40.4% |
||
| Composite 2 Rated | 5,169 59.6% |
||
| Option 2: Using Composite and Component Ratings | |||
| Composite 1 Rated | 3,501 40.4% |
||
| Composite 2 Rated and Sum of Components <= 12 and No More Than One Component Rated 3 or Worse |
4,271 49.3% |
||
| Composite 2 Rated and Sum of Components > 12 or Two or More Components Rated 3 or Worse |
898 10.4% |
||
| Note: The table shows two options for subdividing the 1A insurance category using supervisory ratings. The 1A1 subgroup represents the least risk and the 1A3 subgroup represents the greatest risk. The figures in the cells refer to the number and percentage of 1A institutions. | |||
| Last Updated 12/16/2003 | Questions, Suggestions & Requests |
|
|
| Home Contact Us Search Help SiteMap Forms Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Service Center Website Policies USA.gov |
| FDIC Office of Inspector General |