II. Financial Highlights
In its role as deposit insurer of
financial institutions, the FDIC
promotes the safety and soundness of
insured depository institutions (IDIs).
The following financial highlights
address the performance of the
deposit insurance funds, and discuss
the corporate operating budget and
investment spending.
Deposit Insurance Fund Performance
The FDIC administers the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) and the FSLIC Resolution Fund (FRF), which fulfills the obligations of the former Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (FSLIC) and the former Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC). The following summarizes the condition of the DIF. (See the accompanying graphs on FDIC-Insured Deposits and Insurance Fund Reserve Ratios on the following page.)
For 2012, the DIF’s comprehensive income totaled $21.1 billion compared to comprehensive income of $19.2 billion during 2011. This $1.9 billion year-over-year increase was primarily due to a $3.3 billion increase in revenue from excess Debt Guarantee Program (DGP) fees previously held as systemic risk deferred revenue, partially offset by a $1.1 billion decrease in assessments and a $191 million increase in the provision for insurance losses.
As the TLGP expired at year-end, the DIF recognized revenue of $5.9 billion in 2012, representing the remaining deferred revenue not absorbed by the TLGP for losses. Through the end of the debt issuance period, the FDIC collected $10.4 billion in fees and surcharges under the DGP. In addition, the FDIC collected Transaction Account Guarantee Program (TAG) fees of $1.2 billion for unlimited coverage for noninterest-bearing transaction accounts held by IDIs on all deposit amounts exceeding the fully insured limit of $250,000. Since inception of the program, the TLGP incurred estimated losses of $153 million and $2.1 billion on DGP and TAG Program claims, respectively. Over the duration of the TLGP, $8.5 billion in TLGP assets were transferred to the DIF. In addition, during 2009, surcharges of $872 million were collected and deposited into the DIF.
Assessment revenue was $12.4 billion for 2012. The decrease of $1.1 billion, from $13.5 billion in 2011, was primarily due to lower average assessment rates in 2012, resulting from improvement in the financial condition of the banking industry.
The provision for insurance losses was negative $4.2 billion for 2012, compared to negative $4.4 billion for 2011. The negative provision for 2012 primarily resulted from a reduction in the contingent loss reserve due to the improvement in the financial condition of institutions that were previously identified to fail, and a reduction in the estimated losses for institutions that have failed in the current and prior years.
ESTIMATED DIF INSURED DEPOSITS
SOURCE: Commercial Bank Call and Thrift Financial Reports
Note: Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2010, estimated insured deposits include the entire balance of noninterest-bearing transaction accounts.
DEPOSIT INSURANCE FUND RESERVE RATIOS
Deposit Insurance Fund Selected Statistics
Dollars in Millions |
|
For the years ended December 31 |
2012 |
2011 |
2010 |
Financial Results |
Revenue |
$18,522 |
$16,342 |
$13,380 |
Operating Expenses |
1,778 |
1,625 |
1,593 |
Insurance and Other Expenses (includes provision for loss) |
(4,377) |
(4,541) |
(1,518) |
Net Income (Loss) |
21,121 |
19,257 |
13,305 |
Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
21,131 |
19,179 |
13,510 |
Insurance Fund Balance |
$32,958 |
$11,827 |
$(7,352) |
Fund as a Percentage of Insured Deposits (reserve ratio) |
0.35%* |
0.17% |
(0.12)% |
Selected Statistics |
Total DIF-Member Institutions1 |
7,181* |
7,357 |
7,657 |
Problem Institutions |
651 |
813 |
884 |
Total Assets of Problem Institutions |
$232,701 |
$319,432 |
$390,017 |
Institution Failures |
51 |
92 |
157 |
Total Assets of Failed Institutions in Year2 |
$11,617 |
$34,923 |
$92,085 |
Number of Active Failed Institution Receiverships |
463 |
426 |
336 |
* Figures are as of September 30, 2012.
1Includes commercial banks and savings institutions, but does not include U.S. insured branches of foreign banks.
2Total asset data are based upon the last Call Report filed by the institution prior to failure.
|