FDIC Home - Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
FDIC Home - Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

 
Skip Site Summary Navigation   Home     Deposit Insurance     Consumer Protection     Industry Analysis     Regulations & Examinations     Asset Sales     News & Events     About FDIC  


Home > About FDIC > Financial Reports > Executive Management Report




Executive Management Report

Executive Summary
For the Six Months Ending June 30, 2003

Bank Insurance Fund (BIF):

  • Comprehensive income was $750 million for the six months ending June 30, 2003, compared to $748 million for the same period last year. While interest revenue and unrealized gains from U.S. Treasury obligations decreased by $131 million, this was offset by lower operating expenses of $24 million and lower estimated losses for future and actual failures of $110 million.
  • BIF's Reserve Ratio increased from 1.27% at 12/31/02 to 1/28% at 03/31/03. The fund balance increased by $332 million, or 1.0% while the estimated insured deposits increased by $3.3 billion or 0.1%. For the first six months of 2003, the fund balance increased by $750 million or 2.3%.
  • Receivables from bank resolutions increased by $118 million to $623 million during the first six months of 2003 due to the failure of two BIF-insured institutions. This line item peaked at $1.2 billion at March 31, 2003, and then subsequently declined during the second quarter due to $556 million in recoveries of payments made to cover obligations to insured depositors of these failed banks.
  • As of June 30, 2003, the balance of assets in liquidation was $657 million, which was unchanged from the December 31, 2002 balance. This is primarily due to the fact that 88% of the $1.05 billion in assets retained from the failure of Southern Pacific Bank in February 2003 have already been liquidated and resolved. The failure of The First National Bank of Blanchardville in May 2003 had a minimal effect on the asset portfolio, adding only $35 million in assets at closing.

Savings Association Insurance Fund (SAIF):

  • SAIF's comprehensive income was $336 million for the six months ending June 30, 2003, compared to $388 million for the same period last year. This decrease of $52 million resulted primarily from significant fluctuations in the estimated losses for future failures and unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities.
  • SAIF's Reserve Ratio remained at 1.37% at 3/31/03.

FSLIC Resolution Fund (FRF):

~FRF-FSLIC~

  • The U.S. Department of Treasury (U.S. Treasury) has determined that the FRF is responsible for the payment of judgments and settlements in most supervisory goodwill litigation cases against the U.S. Government.

    Future goodwill litigation judgments and/or settlements cannot be reasonably estimated at this time. This uncertainty arises, in part, from the existence of significant unresolved issues pending at the appellate or trial court level, as well as the unique circumstances of each case.

    Funds to cover goodwill judgments and settlements are provided by an open-ended appropriation as provided by section 110 of the Department of Justice Appropriations Act, 2000. Because of this, any liabilities for goodwill litigation should have no material impact on the financial condition of the FRF-FSLIC.

In addition to payments for goodwill judgments and settlements, the FRF is responsible for reimbursing the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) for its goodwill litigation expenses.

In June 2003, the United States Supreme Court declined to hear plaintiff's appeal of an unfavorable ruling by the Circuit Court of Appeals. Additionally, the plaintiff in another case decided to withdraw its claim after receiving an unfavorable ruling from the Appeals Court. The FRF-FSLIC also paid $954 thousand for stipulated attorneys fees and costs in one goodwill case during June 2003. For the year, the trial court entered orders dismissing 15 goodwill litigation cases, and two goodwill cases were settled for a total of $30 thousand. In April 2003, FRF-FSLIC paid the first goodwill settlement for $10 thousand and received an appropriation for the same amount from the U.S. Treasury. The second settlement for $20 thousand has not yet been paid by FRF-FSLIC.

Paralleling the goodwill litigation cases are eight similar cases alleging that the government breached agreements regarding tax benefits associated with certain FSLIC-assisted acquisitions. These agreements allegedly contained the promise of tax deductions for losses incurred on the sale of certain thrift assets purchased by plaintiffs, from the FSLIC, even though the FSLIC provided them with tax-exempt reimbursement. A provision in the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (popularly referred to as the "Guarini legislation") eliminated the tax deductions for these losses.

To date, there have been liability determinations in six of the "Guarini" cases. In two of these cases, damages of approximately $28 million and $70 million were awarded in February and April 2003, respectively, by the Court of Federal Claims. Both cases have been appealed by the Department of Justice. In a third case decided on June 3, 2003, the Court ruled that the plaintiffs were entitled to damages (approximately $48.7 million) but ordered further proceedings to determine the exact amount. A decision on liability has not been made in the one pending Guarini case. An eighth case was settled during 2002 for $20 thousand.

The FDIC believes that it is possible that substantial amounts may be paid from the FRF-FSLIC as a result of the judgments and settlements from the "Guarini litigation." However, because of the litigation of damages computation is still ongoing, the amount of the damages in all of these cases is not estimable at this time.

~FRF-RTC~

  •  The RTC Completion Act (Act) requires the FDIC to return to the U.S. Treasury any funds that were transferred to the RTC pursuant to the Act but not needed by the RTC. The Act made available approximately $18 billion worth of additional funding, of which $4.556 billion was used. In addition, the FDIC must transfer to the Resolution Funding Corporation (REFCORP) the net proceeds from the sale of FRF-RTC assets (once all liabilities of the FRF-RTC have been provided for) to pay the interest on REFCORP bonds. Any such payments benefit the U.S. Treasury, which would otherwise be obligated to pay the interest on the bonds.

    With the last payment of $271 million on March 3, 2000, the FRF-RTC has fully repaid the $4.556 billion to the U.S. Treasury. Beginning in April 2000, the FRF-RTC has made twelve payments totaling $4.572 billion to REFCORP. The last payment to REFCORP of $50 million was made on April 10, 2003. The FRF-RTC cash balance is $310 million at June 30, 2003.

    One securitization deal remains active as of June 30, 2003, and is expected to terminate in 2003.

TABLE OF CONTENTS | NEXT PAGE

  

Last Updated 08/21/2003

finance@fdic.gov


Home    Contact Us    Search    Help    SiteMap    Forms
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Service Center    Website Policies    USA.gov
FDIC Office of Inspector General